Album Rating: 4.5
Autocorrect damn you
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
They all enjoy individual works theyve done but Animals is the only they all agree is awesome is what i meant lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I think waters hates dark side cause Mason was solely credited to a song
|
| |
This IS my favorite Floyd, but it's often too dense to listen to and so I find myself listening to WYWH more often. Dogs is my absolute favorite Floyd track tho.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
How is anything Floyd has done something you could consider dense?
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
idk about dense, he may mean inaccessible cuz this album definitely is, compared to most of their other stuff
|
| |
I'm only talking from a conceptual viewpoint. It's hard for me to listen to tracks like Dogs in the background because I find myself wanting to read into the lyrics and take it all in as it's own thing, if that makes sense.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
I know what you mean, but I don't think I'd use the word dense to describe it
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
maybe demanding
|
| |
Dense as an adjective in music probably applies to to the actual sound of the music more, sorry- y'all are right
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I just don't like how unnecessarily long that ambient section is in Dogz. Scrap it and yeah top 3 Floyd song
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
u plebe ^
|
| |
I couldn't do without the ambient section honestly, so eeriely beautiful and makes the track what it is.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Stone [55]
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
it's a top 3 or 5 floyd song regardless spacemang
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
stone
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
dog noises
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Yeah I feel that I just don't see the same love
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I might honestly prefer pigs
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
I do prefer pigs, no shame
|
| |
|
|
