Album Rating: 3.5
Easy: Think this has energy and character.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
[Fire emoji][fire emoji][fire emoji]
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
This definitely has both energy and character. Sick ass atmosphere too. The production isn't M&D level but it's still good.
Also sup Ford.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Yep this is def beneath M&D, but still a badass album 🤘🏻
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
i think they're pretty much equal. m&d is catchier but this has more longevity imo
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Yeah I agree they're pretty much equal. This is far more atmospheric, M&D focuses more on heaviness (not to say M&D doesn't have atmosphere though because it does for sure, just not the main focus).
I just meant M&D's production was better, but I still like the production here.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I just think M&D has better songs overall, but this still has some bangers m/
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
nice bounceback after the somewhat limp KoC
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
“limp KoC”
Lmao 😂
|
| |
Genius if done purposefully
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Grew on me more. Had to get past the production but slays after the fact.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I still don't see the issue with the production on here. Just curious, what don't you like about it?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
production isn't as good as their old stuff that's the problem (:
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Yeah, like FFG's god-tier production lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
pretty good but im not into it like i was, i may have just overplayed immo last year in prep for seeing them twice
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
This > m&d
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
ehhh it's kinda close but no M&D is massive to me
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
They're pretty close honestly
I've struggled at times with which one of the two is a 4.5
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Maybe they both r ¯_(ツ)_/¯
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Thanks
|
| |
|
|
