Album Rating: 4.5
And the ideal rating system would be a 1-10 system that allows increments of .5
|
| |
an ideal rating system would be 1 and 5.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Then 5 this
|
| |
it's much closer to a 1
|
| |
Very true, binary rating systems are giga-brain level.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Fuckin' Fantano has been the real innovator all along with his "it's good/not good" series
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
“I feel like there’s a difference between a 3.5 and a 3.8 album”
Sure, so round up to 4. Ratings are only useful to have a self catalogue for shit you jam cause this site won’t let you organize it any other way. Best rating system would just be a “Hell yes” or “Hell no” binary
|
| |
positive rating system™
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I don't even see numbers in ratings anymore
|
| |
Ur number blind too?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
"an ideal rating system would be 1 and 5."
That is what YouTube thought when discontinuing the five stars and implementing the like/dislike system. Anyone remember YouTube's five stars?
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
R.I.P. to the fallen heroes
|
| |
call a 3.8 a 4 again I fuckin dare you
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Says Montsegnor Eyesore with that 4.9
|
| |
there is nothing more aesthetic than Bjork's two best albums being tied at 4.9
|
| |
3.8 is a 4 for people with a spine
|
| |
And it's either a 5 or a 1 for people who have two spines
|
| |
people who can move their backs at multiple directions at the same time eww you fking snake
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I'm fine with 3.7s and 3.8s but 3.4s and 3.9s should be an instant ban
|
| |
lmao
|
| |
|
|
