Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

these guys pretty much ripped off metallica

Album Rating: 2.5

only worse

Album Rating: 2.5

rip Rev the bassist

clever

Album Rating: 4.5

I've got a soft spot for A7X. This album is enjoyable and Shadows is getting better at singing.



City of Evil is still half b/s though.

Album Rating: 4.0

I guarantee if this album did not have the name Avenged Sevenfold in front of it, it would have been rated better

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

Can someone please explain how this album is rated on average a 3.2 while the self-titled is on average rated 2.7? The admin who reviewed the self-titled album is a douchebag and deserves to be banned from reviewing metalcore, because a lot of users just rated 1 because the admin review rated 1.



Self-titled destroys nightmare. This album is more bland and some how found it's way to be boring, unoriginal and uncatchy compared to the self-titled. The slower riffs are depressing and bring this weird nasty feeling in me. There are a couple songs I love though. It doesn't suck and hey I give it a listen now and then, but common guys, don't suck the admins dick so much...

Album Rating: 3.5

@TrantaLocked



Butthurt much? :L

Feckin' fanboys...

storm in a teacup is back omfg

"I guarantee if this album did not have the name Avenged Sevenfold in front of it, it would have been rated better"


Oh, that's so metal.

I guarantee if this album did not have the name Avenged Sevenfold in front of it, it would have been rated better

"I guarantee if this album did not have Mike Portnoy, it would have been rated lower"

fixed'

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

You don't need to be a fanboy to recognize a problem with a 1/5 rating.

Oh, please keep going. You're posts are so enlightening. No one thinks like you do, Tranta. You're so orignal!!! Such a revolutionary!

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

More of the problem is that when an admin reviews some thing badly, users generally follow. I'm not saying the self-titled album would have scored an honest 4 by unbiased users with no staff review, but bear with me here. If you look at the bar graph for the self-titled, you'll see how heavily users rated 1/5. It isn't natural and It's obvious the rating is out of wack because of the staff who reviewed the album. Of course the music is radio-centered but it isn't as terrible as a 1/5, or in other words an F-.

Album Rating: 2.0

It's a 1 if you think it's a 1

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

Compared to music I've seen get 4 stars here, it objectively isn't a 1.

If there wasn't a 1 star staff review I gaurantee more people would give it a chance and less people would rate 1.

"More of the problem is that when an admin reviews some thing badly, users generally follow"

Who actually gives a fuck what other people rate an album?

Album Rating: 2.0

it objectively isn't a 1



It objectively isn't anything

i just realized i have this as a 4.5

bout to drop it to like... a 3.5, maybe a 4.