shoutbox deleting coward

Album Rating: 4.0

I didnt want you in my shoutbox champ. I don't associate with your kind lmao you've 2'd too many great albums I love. No shoutboxes for you your in timeout

you're*

*your

my what

oh damn my comment is out of date now that's sad

no i was just twisting it in my usual fashion

i should have said your * mom

yeah i got your comment, the one i was referring to got updated tho and now only the second your is wrong

damn half assed edits

Album Rating: 3.0

listening to this album while reading this review actually makes a ton of sense, pos'd

Album Rating: 3.5

Review isn't that bad but track by track already does not work well, and then adding an AI sauce over it—however much that might helps your writing—never fundamentally improves a review.



People are overreacting though, the criticism in the review is fair. The review does feel a bit forced, partly due to being track by track, partly due to the AI, and partly due to the fact that the same criticism, Randy's lyrics and the band rehashing ideas, keeps coming back a bit too much. This reads like 'Tundra light' to me.

Album Rating: 3.0

for an AI review it's not really far off from a good bead on this album lmfao

Album Rating: 2.0

Not AI



Though I find it funny that you criticize my "rehashing" but that is the crux of this album... so you are complaining about a mirror doing what a mirror does ;)

Album Rating: 3.5

why are you using all those — then? I'm sure it's not 100% AI, but it for sure reads like a lot has been through an AI to 'improve' the writing.



And just because the music is a lot of 'rehashing' in your opinion, does not mean you should do it in the review. If you think it makes the music bad, then why do it in your review? ;)

id probably rate it higher than you based on first listen, but i dont necassarily disagree with the review. its def LOG doing LOG, just with more bite and drive than theyve had for a while

Listening to this at the moment, solid album albeit nothing particularly groundbreaking.

Album Rating: 2.0

— — — — — —

Oh no so spooky AI

They've been around forever and somehow humanity only acknowledged their existence when they became a "problem"



As for the "rehashing" comment: that's sort of the point of the review, yeah? I'm writing based on what I'm hearing, not some predetermined opinion that I have of something before I even experience it. Have you ever disliked, or liked, food that you have never tasted before?

So if you see me returning to the same point that I've made earlier in the review, it's because the music is circling back to the same riff/tone/texture/etc.

Salt remains salty, sweet remains sweet

Giving a pos. It's well written, though doing a TBT review reads more like a list than an overall review or summary. I'm not a review expert by any means but the better reviews I've read over the years tend to veer away from TBT.

Also negging a review because you don't agree with the rating or the guys POV is petty bullshit, especially now with sputnik being as old as it is. Actually provide critique of the review like beardog is doing.

incorrectly used em dashes > incorrectly used semicolons