Machine Head Catharsis
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
DarkSideOfLucca
January 26th 2018


17611 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Yeah but no one liked their nu-metal phase. I was hoping they would be embarrassed by that. And I dig some nu-metal but it was not a good look for them. It's even more pathetic now that it's like two decades out of date and they are all late 40s/early 50s.

swipenet
January 26th 2018


3352 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Doesn't work agreed. Still picturing Robb from "From This Day" lol

Flugmorph
January 26th 2018


34329 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

you may not like it but this is what peak flynn lyrical prowess looks like

swipenet
January 26th 2018


3352 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

XDD

Toondude10
January 26th 2018


15186 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

hahaha

swipenet
January 26th 2018


3352 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

*Tommy Wiseau laugh*

Toondude10
January 26th 2018


15186 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

I still don't really think that this is as awful as everyone is rating it to be.



Maybe they just turned it off after Bastards and thought "well this is the whole album anyways so what's the fucking point?"

artiswar
January 26th 2018


13527 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Bastards is good. It's corny as fuck but the emotion and intention behind it is totally genuine and it comes through in the music. I think most people have been incredibly reactionary in writing this album off on the day of release. It's super uneven and cringey at times but it's at worst below average.

Toondude10
January 26th 2018


15186 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

It's not the worst track off the album, but if it had better lyrics I think it could've been an okay song. The style doesn't really suit them though.

artiswar
January 27th 2018


13527 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Triple Beam is like top 3, California Bleeding is bottom 3. Bastards, well, I don't even know what that is really, but it's an interesting experience at least.

Toondude10
January 27th 2018


15186 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

There's like, 5 or 6 bad songs on here. But out of a 15-track album, I'd still say that's pretty decent tbh.

artiswar
January 27th 2018


13527 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

exactly... I don't know why they didn't just put out a 10 track album like a reg band, other than they just don't really give a fuck about quality control anymore.

Toondude10
January 27th 2018


15186 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

because they wanted "to be different" on this



to be fair, they did kind of needed to break the mold a little bit, but here I think they went too far.

artiswar
January 27th 2018


13527 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

they're at a point where they don't need to try to prove themselves anymore. They've already done that. They're never topping The Blackening or anything from that era, so they're just having fun at this point.

swipenet
January 27th 2018


3352 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I feel like whatever shit they made post Bloodstone they just decided to slap on here

swipenet
January 27th 2018


3352 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Other than "Is There Anybody Out There?" I guess

artiswar
January 27th 2018


13527 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Bloodstone was super bloated as well. The overall quality was way higher though, even for the filler.

artiswar
January 27th 2018


13527 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

why, is behind dumpsters not where you typically eat pussy

artiswar
January 27th 2018


13527 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

There's a lot of moments on this that made me chuckle

swipenet
January 27th 2018


3352 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Robb's a fucking g didn't ya know



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy