Album Rating: 2.0
boring, lazy, disappointing
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
and here I thought blond was for guys
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
intentional gender subversion maybe
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
oh shit listening to nights now. first part was quite boring but then bang
seigfried is pretty sweet too
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
nights is my jam yeah
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
blond/e is the only English word spelled differently based on gender, referencing his bisexuality
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
"tack on pretentious overly analytical garbage " aka actually being thoughtful about what you write?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
"blond/e is the only English word spelled differently based on gender"
yh I didn't know this
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Yeah and shit ton of this review is pretentious as fuck anyway
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
"blond/e is the only English word spelled differently based on gender, referencing his bisexuality"
Absolute bollocks. Bin it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
there might be some others but I didn't realise blond was the male form in english
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
blond and blonde derive from French
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
i know
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off
The title is clearly Blond why was it changed?
Edit: nevermind
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Fucking finally
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
lol way to try to get a feature. maybe try to let the album settle for a bit next time man
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
so is this fucking fire or what?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
exactly ALA. just cuz you're review is 5 pages long doesn't mean it's good either
|
| |
"In convincing conclusion"... This review has some terrible phrasing.
|
| |
And the first sentence still doesn't make sense. Did he edit this for real? If so, he missed some glaringly obvious stuff.
|
| |
|
|