Wild Beasts Boy King
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
TheWrenKing
August 5th 2016


1733 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

yeah this is great but at the end of the day probably their worst



love celestial creatures tho

Pangea
August 5th 2016


10946 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Excited for this

anat
August 5th 2016


5852 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

'Celestial Creatures' is wonderful.

DrJohn
August 5th 2016


1041 Comments


not rly a fan but celestial creatures is decent... great write-up btw

crossparallel
August 5th 2016


91 Comments


Honestly surprised that I didn't hate this. Adored Limbo, Panto, loved Two Dancers, liked Smother etc... Clear trend there, but boy they went far enough this time for it to work.

DoofusWainwright
August 5th 2016


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Thanks Doc

Lord(e)Po)))ts
August 6th 2016


70256 Comments


"One of the most impressive catalogues of recent years,"

lol

dbizzles
August 6th 2016


15408 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Oh, Posty, I believe he's right. I can't think of another band that has put out as many great albums in a row over five years time as these guys, but I love these blokes.



'Closing track 'Dreamliner' is little more than ambient textures and a pretty Thorpe vocal but...'



Not sure if you missed a word here or something. Anyway, I got to listen to this a few minutes ago. Celestial Creatures, 2BU (why???) and Dreamliner were all great. He the Colossus and Eat Your Heart Out Adonis were okay and the rest was... not for me.

brandontaylor
August 6th 2016


1260 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

i didnt dig this one at all :/ didn't think the change in direction worked for them and this sounded a bit like a watered down glass animals or something. the closing track was nice tho i wish they stuck with that sound

DoofusWainwright
August 6th 2016


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Pots I'm struggling to think of many bands out there on album number 5 who didn't drop the ball once in those first four albums



Dbizzles it looks like it worked out as expected, I was hoping you'd warm to one of the early tracks too but at least you liked half the album.



Brandon I can understand people not digging this direction for the band but I'm hoping it might grow on people. I maintain it was definitely an album written to sound great live.

Lord(e)Po)))ts
August 6th 2016


70256 Comments


"Pots I'm struggling to think of many bands out there on album number 5 who didn't drop the ball once in those first four albums"

thats because you solely listen to relatively mainstream shitty indie bands bud

Lord(e)Po)))ts
August 6th 2016


70256 Comments


plus, while granted that everything they've done is good for sure, literally none of their albums aside from Two Dancers are anything to write home about, nor are they anything that special.

DoofusWainwright
August 6th 2016


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I think irrespective of genre you'd find it hard to name many artists with 4 or 5 decent full length albums in a row released in the span of 8 years



I'll admit they are more steady than mind blowing at times

Lord(e)Po)))ts
August 6th 2016


70256 Comments


id list bands that are on album 5 or more without dropping the ball once in the first four that have had infinitely more impressive output than this band but that would be an absurd waste of time given that there are so fucking many

Lord(e)Po)))ts
August 6th 2016


70256 Comments


"I think irrespective of genre you'd find it hard to name many artists with 4 or 5 decent full length albums in a row released in the span of 8 years"

rofl

Lord(e)Po)))ts
August 6th 2016


70256 Comments


i like how you've now lowered the standard of quality from MOST IMPRESSIVE CATALOGUES OF RECENT YEARS to FOUR OR FIVE DECENT ALBUMS. you're just making it even more overtly debatable

DoofusWainwright
August 6th 2016


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

well if you reduce it down to bands who are effectively working within the traditional realm of popular song I'm at a loss to know who you're referring to but hey, ever was it so

Lord(e)Po)))ts
August 6th 2016


70256 Comments


bare in mind that i like this band and think they are good, i just think that your initial claim is utterly outlandish and pretty much objectively un-backable and that your refined claims are actually even more absurd

Lord(e)Po)))ts
August 6th 2016


70256 Comments


"well if you reduce it down to bands who are effectively working within the traditional realm of popular song I'm lost to know who you're referring to but hey, ever was it so"

"well if you take what i initially said and bastardize the shit out of it to support my outlandish claims..."

Lord(e)Po)))ts
August 6th 2016


70256 Comments


why the fuck would i reduce it down to "bands who are effectively working within the traditional realm of popular song"

im sorry did i miss the part where you said

"One of the most impressive catalogues of recent years for bands who are exclusively effectively working within my subjective definition of the traditional realm of popular song"



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy