http://www.sputnikmusic.com/review/65170/Attila-Guilty-Pleasure/
a lesson on how to write yr first review on a shit band, from yours truly
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I was just starting to have fun too...
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Okay I get it torts. I just have to change my opinion entirely, right? Wow that's so insightful. I would have never thought to look at it like that.
Could you look at my Slaves review? Maybe with your knowledge I could improve that too.
http://www.sputnikmusic.com/review/68245/Slaves-Routine-Breathing/
|
| |
it isn't the opinion. Its all about how you convey it, how many times m u s t I r e p e a t t h a t
the slaves review was much better
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Sorry, I guess I couldn't wrap my head around that concept. Thank you for sharing torts! I know how I'm gonna fix my reviews of bad bands now. I'll just start conveying my opinion more negatively, right?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
But in any case, thank you Ed. I'll reconsider my stance on sticking to this site for a bit longer.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
I'm upset that I wasted my time reading through those comments. Review came off very fanboyish but its really not that awful. When your a fanboy sometimes it can be hard to review an album and be seen as having an objective and fair opinion. Once upon a time I reviewed The Word Alive - Deceiver and gave it a 5 (lol).
http://www.sputnikmusic.com/review/38815/The-Word-Alive-Deceiver/
The problem is when you have an unpopular opinion on an album (such as rating this a 5), your review needs to be stellar for people to accept it. Lucky for me, Deceiver was actually very well received when it came out.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
ITT: torts is a phaggot
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Confirmed
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Some good songs here, but classic? No
|
| |
|
|
