Album Rating: 3.5
Yep COL, Neurosis and Isis are all fantastic.
Oh and Rosetta is okay too I guess haha
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I need to listen to more Rosetta. Only heard like 5 songs out of context.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
the galiliean satellites is good. listen to both discs simultaneously
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
lol mongi "in terms of emotions"
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I know I'm a hilarious human being
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
You can't go wrong with any of Rosetta's first three albums. They are in the more "uplifting" side of Post-Metal.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Yea definitely, I also never really found isis to be sad or depressing either.
|
| |
Wolfe don't act like you don't know what Mongi means.
Neurosis' music is generally more crushing and heavy while Isis' (especially later on) was far more emotional and intricate.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
nah neurosis had their own brand of emotion that rivaled and dare I say beats Isis's shit that sounds twinkly in comparison
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Two distinct sounds for sure.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Yea no doubt about that
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Ok let's try this, IMO:
Rosetta: uplifting
Isis: angry (early) / melancholic (later)
Neurosis: angry / evil / apocalyptic (for the most part)
CoL: depressive / melancholic
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
lame as fuck
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
well that wasn't too kind
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Depending on who you are.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Neurosis are a lot darker in terms of atmosphere and emotion in comparison to ISIS.
As far as Rosetta are concerned, I second that their first three albums are all fantastic. My personal fave would have to be Wake/Lift.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Glad I could help clear that up.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Lol, that took an interesting turn.
But yea Neurosis is definitely more hard hitting like that.
I think id put it like this: Isis>>>>Neurosis>COL>Rosetta
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
this still rips goddamn
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
m/.
|
| |
|
|
