Album Rating: 5.0
I don't particularly care for your review, mainly because I disagree with your song ratings. However, that's not going to stop me from admitting that it was (for the most part) well written.
|
| |
This album wasn't all that great in my opinion. I guess it wasn't that bad either, but still not great. Good review
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
There's no harpsichord in "Lucy In the Sky". Can't you tell hyuck hyuck? Eh. Just kidding. But there is no harpsichord.
|
| |
Did I say there was one?
Naw, not really. I said harpsichordorgan, which doesnt mean its both, i meant it had the qualties of a harpsichord but was most likely an organ. Maybe an electric piano.
then again, the keyboard instrument was too high pitched to be a harpsichord. Ive listened to a lot more baroque since i wrote this review (what, like two years ago?) so I know more now what one really sounds like, instead of the sound on my synthesizer :p
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
It be a mellotron dawg. Anyway, I was justing fucking with you.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
why does everyone diss on Fixing A Whole
its the best
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
This is a great album, and its cool that they were allowed to do so much experimentation. that being said, i think that bands who try to be exxperimental are just put down now, which is why theres so much bland music now....also this is a tad overrated
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I like the album but totally disagree with your ratings (except for Within You Without You)
I think that Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite is better than you say, and I think that next to Within You Without You the worst songs are the reprise and Good Morning, Good Morning.
When I'm 64 is nice and With a Little Help from My Friends is great
|
| |
|
|