Liturgy The Ark Work
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
someguest
April 17th 2015


30519 Comments


yeah guys genres have nothing to do with music c'mon

Lord(e)Po)))ts
April 17th 2015


70256 Comments


It just doesn't lend itself to conventional labels all that well.


says who? its experimental avant-garde blackened glitch ass fusion bullshit.

someguest
April 17th 2015


30519 Comments


album was written by bj novak

deathschool
April 17th 2015


29479 Comments


experimental avant-garde blackened glitch ass fusion bullshit = conventional

Lord(e)Po)))ts
April 17th 2015


70256 Comments


and while we are on the subject anyone who went into this album wearing their bathory shirt and their shittiest kvlt ass m/ l33t attitude expecting to judge this for not being trv3 as fuk that was never the point and we get it, you like hellhammer, congratulations on listening to one genre and fearing experimentation, we are so proud of you for having a new deafheaven to bitch about

TalonsOfFire
Emeritus
April 17th 2015


21027 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

That be a lot of genres

Lord(e)Po)))ts
April 17th 2015


70256 Comments



experimental avant-garde blackened glitch ass fusion bullshit = conventional


it was pretty easy for me to label tho!

oltnabrick
April 17th 2015


41002 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

k stop

TalonsOfFire
Emeritus
April 17th 2015


21027 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

Comparing this to Deafheaven or bands like Lantlos is a pretty big stretch tbh, maybe if we're talking about their first album.

Lord(e)Po)))ts
April 17th 2015


70256 Comments


eat a dick oltna

someguest
April 17th 2015


30519 Comments


I'd keep an instrumental version of this in rotation.

Lord(e)Po)))ts
April 17th 2015


70256 Comments


Comparing this to Deafheaven or bands like Lantlos is a pretty big stretch tbh, maybe if we're talking about their first album.


who said anything about lantlos? also you missed the point which was this: this album isnt supposed to be black metal. that doesnt mean its good, (and im not pointing any fingers here) but it does mean that if you are going to hate on it for not being metal no one ever said it was going to be to begin with so whats the point

deathschool
April 17th 2015


29479 Comments


The last three tracks here are the best, I think.

Lord(e)Po)))ts
April 17th 2015


70256 Comments


the one thing i do dearly hate on this album is the fucking fanfare intro

TalonsOfFire
Emeritus
April 17th 2015


21027 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

Not a fan of the vocals

Lord(e)Po)))ts
April 17th 2015


70256 Comments


and the first half of follow is annoying and goes on to long. everything after that im down with bring the fusion buttfuckery

someguest
April 17th 2015


30519 Comments


no one with a brain is comparing this to deafheaven. the vocals suck, and they suck hard. they bring this down a lot.

all there is to it.

oltnabrick
April 17th 2015


41002 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

jesus christ

Relinquished
April 17th 2015


50089 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

yes, he's been dead for some time

deathschool
April 17th 2015


29479 Comments


I think the Deafheaven comparison is mostly because both albums piss off black metal fans to hilarious extents.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy