Pink Floyd Wish You Were Here
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Jots
Emeritus
November 9th 2014


7632 Comments


Tons of writers use alts to experiment with their writing without worrying about damaging their reputation. Pussy move or no, it's not uncommon. I'm just saying people are crucifying the guy because it's PF.

ArsMoriendi
November 9th 2014


42336 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

lol 3 people neg'd a well written review just because they hate that this guy put it on an

alt/gave it a 3.



What type of community are we if we neg well written things due to personal biases of the

album it's written for?

Jots
Emeritus
November 9th 2014


7632 Comments


Nvm Ars just agreed with me(sort of), I retract what I said

deathschool
November 9th 2014


29479 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

"8 of 11 thought this review was well written"



"Crucifying"



*Shrug*

Propose
November 9th 2014


959 Comments


tool is better than pink floyd easily

wow best drumming ever, cool lyrics, unbelievable riffs vs a bunch of boring old fucks who are only praised because of their grand dad told them they were good. Tool is literally perfect, like I can't even imagine what else you could ask for tbh.

SharkTooth
November 9th 2014


15015 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

"What type of community are we if we neg well written things due to personal biases of the

album it's written for?"



12 year old bitches, surprise!

Jots
Emeritus
November 9th 2014


7632 Comments


I mean the comments but w/e, not worth arguing about tbh
Edit: for the record I'm not talking about the review itself

SeaAnemone
November 9th 2014


21427 Comments


Ars um who said they neg'd for that reason?
I neg'd it because it's poorly reasoned and not nearly compellingly argued enough to warrant the obvious backlash this guy he knew he was going to get. it's not a good review.

YakNips
November 9th 2014


20114 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

ars did you write this

ArsMoriendi
November 9th 2014


42336 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Fuck no, I wouldn't 3 this. Plus I fanboy over "Have a Cigar"

Propose
November 9th 2014


959 Comments


"um who said they neg'd for that reason?
I neg'd it because it's poorly reasoned and not nearly compellingly argued enough to warrant the obvious backlash this guy he knew he was going to get. it's not a good review."

It is a good review because most average reviews on this site are of this caliber or not worse but they'll recieve 100% approval just because they agree with your opinion, and if they don't then you'll hold them to an impossibly high standard you rationalizing hamster.

tempest--
November 9th 2014


20634 Comments


this is probably snide let's be real

DrMaximus
November 9th 2014


12896 Comments


I'm pissed

SharkTooth
November 9th 2014


15015 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Ars um who said they neg'd for that reason?

at least one person neg'd for this reason tbh



deathschool
November 9th 2014


29479 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Oh. Shit. The Doctor is in.

ArsMoriendi
November 9th 2014


42336 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Yeah it's one of those things where people judge things they disagree with to a higher standard than things they agree with.



I forget the term for it...

NordicMindset
November 9th 2014


25137 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Superiority!

SharkTooth
November 9th 2014


15015 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

confession time: I have never listened to this album.

so yeah, I have no idea if this guy is right or wrong tbh

tempest--
November 9th 2014


20634 Comments


double standard

Gwyn.
November 9th 2014


17270 Comments


How does Have a Cigar have "Sloppy" songwriting



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy