The xx Coexist
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Aids
March 10th 2013


24518 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

see I was in the UK right before it was coming out and man everyone was talking about it, there were posters everywhere, you couldnt escape the single



I tried to catch their show at Shepherd's Bush (London) in early Septmeber, but it sold out like right away.

anarchistfish
March 10th 2013


30368 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

maybe i'm just a hermit



back when they won the mercury prize, then they were inescapable. holy shit I've never seen such hype

around a rising band

Aids
March 10th 2013


24518 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

yeah there was more hype for their first one but also that one was way better soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

anarchistfish
March 10th 2013


30368 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

even if this was mediocre it's not like the british media are beyond hyping mediocre indie releases

olivianigma
March 11th 2013


164 Comments


I don't know about the UK but there was a lot of hype about this album in the US for sure

kingsoby1
Emeritus
March 12th 2013


4970 Comments


nice review. i wish i liked this as much as the first record

DBrown
August 22nd 2013


7 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I have vacillated between really disliking this album and finding it intriguing for months. It's definitely not my thing but still has some indescribable allure for me.



(*sweet review)

RadicalEd
November 14th 2013


9546 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

This was so disappointing

Cygnatti
December 3rd 2013


36071 Comments


I heard this band constantly rips of one of my favorite albums, gotta here this now.

OysterizerInsomniac
January 4th 2014


443 Comments


I didn't enjoy this quite as much as their debut, but not by much. They both have pretty much the exact same sound, so I'm not really sure how anyone who gave their debut a 4 could give this a 2.5 or whatever.

anarchistfish
January 4th 2014


30368 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

it is much less pop-y, and so less accessible. the general sound is the same but there's less focus on the hooks and vocals

aok
August 3rd 2015


4626 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

don't call it a sophomore slump ok, but the less you know the better is soooo much better than this corporate abomination of a follow to "fantasy" & "vcr". shit was even christalized and intro'd better than flatbush zombies. i'm forgetting all my favorite george harrison songs?

ShadowRemains
August 6th 2015


27841 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

sunset rules but otherwise this is pretty meh

anarchistfish
August 6th 2015


30368 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

biggest grower

Swoon420
October 30th 2015


341 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Not bad.

The first album was better but this is a grower for sure.

Conmaniac
August 2nd 2016


27694 Comments


is this worth checking if I enjoyed their first album?

aok
September 10th 2016


4626 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Not bad.



The first album was better but this is a grower for sure. [2]



It's more disappointing not to have heard anything new from Romy or Oliver in 4 years!



although .. http://www.nme.com/news/the-xx/89828

Snide
March 25th 2017


7050 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Ended up checking these guys after I heard their superb track "Together" off of the Great Gatsby soundtrack. Pretty good stuff, nothing really comes close to that song though.

bloc
August 6th 2017


70370 Comments


Angels is really beautiful



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy