Album Rating: 5.0
the logic behind the col vs isis vs neurosis debate is fucking retarded
neurosis > col > isis
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
neurosis = isis > col
sup
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
right opinion tho
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Fucking excellent album
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
im not a fanatic i havent even heard col's first album or neurosis's first couple im just sayin
|
| |
all post-metal is the same anyways
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
wrong
hehe
EOES, SATH, and salvation are all better than any isis album cept maybe oceanic
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
and yeah new neurosis is ehh
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
when did i say it was a col album
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
"col was the same as every other second rate post metal band"
like which ones
"all post-metal is the same anyways"
yeah if you're a big fan of dicks
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
but you said they were second rate and you meant s/t and The Beyond when all that was made in 2001 and 2003 so they weren't second rate, they just influenced second raters
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
bby i'm comin in ur angle
callin their music second rate when at the time and even now it shouldn't be considered such when they're as heavy as all oceans combined
|
| |
haven't even heard a neurosis album in full and i can tell you right now that rosetta is better
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
sup zepdude
|
| |
hey man
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
haven't even heard a neurosis album in full and i can tell you right now that rosetta is better
reported
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
calling anything second rate before second rate existed in retrospect is easy
getting a woman to lay with zepdude bro here isn't
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
which ones were they
|
| |
wait is time to burn post-metal?
they're pretty cool post-metal
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
no man we're talkin about u callin SAtH second rate when all the second rate shit was after that and you're calling it second rate in retrospect when you know that you'd enjoy it if you heard it back then
bro don't make me break out the volcano
|
| |
|
|
