Album Rating: 3.0
Oh I definitely like bands that people consider shitty. Just less of them now. Ha ha.
|
| |
I'd rather people didn't vote my reviews as "not well written" just because they disagree. There's few, if any, grammatical mistakes, and plenty of clear, concise, relevant analysis. Sigh...that's the internet for ya...
HAI U GUISE Y U NEG HIM Y U GOTZTA BE TRLLIN
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
1 of 4? really? this has GOT to be people who hate the band. Honestly...
Even if you didn't think it was a GREAT review, it's still decent. Trolls, trolls, and more trolls.
|
| |
As decent as I think it is, I can see why people would neg' it. Most of the content is solid, but it's executed in quite an amateurish way. But then again, maybe they're just haters (same thing happened to me on my Take This to Your Grave review). All in all, it was a good review, and you have a lot of potential. Try to extract ideas from staff, contributor, or Irving reviews, as these reviews are where you wanna go for early inspiration and development of your review writing style.
|
| |
Like it how Irving gets an honourable mention.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
jmorris: If this were a different band you might have had more luck with the people here. If you take an unpopular view on an album, you need to support it really well.
Your review wasn't bad, but it didn't support your extremely high rating. I'm not going to neg, but you should understand that that's why other people did.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Phid, wtf am i missing? Have you HEARD the album? It's like the perfect pop-rock album! Why's it raining hate in here?
|
| |
this site is a hate storm
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
See, that's the thing. You don't explain WHY it's the perfect pop-rock album.
Also, no it's not.
|
| |
Were actually really nice guys.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
^ It's true. Don't take any of this personally.
|
| |
take all of this personally. we hate your guts.
just kidding
|
| |
We bond over the internet ( well as much as we can) its not a full on sausage fest.
|
| |
|
|