Album Rating: 2.0

so basically, you use bad grammar but you do so under a literary/artistic license?

Album Rating: 2.0

I have sex with your reviews, Mister John Melvin.

Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

lol i don't need to read that



already pos'd

Just because you take Radiohead so seriously (and many fans do) doesn't mean they take themselves so seriously.

Thom has said time and time again they're nothing more than a pop band

Ugh, images are forming in front of my eyes.

Yeah it's just funny you mentioned it so vividly in your review --the points about Thom being humorless and about the music being difficult-- because, while I assume you don't have too much respect for Miles's opinions, but he definitely knows his Radiohead... and we were having a conversation about how seriously people take Radiohead sometimes, when Thom has talked about how he makes pop music (not "popular," but pop in the sense that it's accessible, easy to listen to, other traits of regular pop music, etc.) and has cited his sense of humor in his work, stuff like that... so I thought it was worth pointing out.

Then again, I'm not the expert on this, but I'm sure couldwinarabbit will stop by later and add on to what I said.

Album Rating: 2.0

I hope you have the courtesy to look them in the eye when you do it, Brandon.

Album Rating: 4.0

One thing I will say is that if Thom didn't have a humor, then the Lotus Flower video would not exist. I don't care what the Radiohead fanboys say, that video was created as a massive joke.

Album Rating: 4.0

the video for Lotus Flower rulz

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

I wholeheartedly disagree. Radiohead are molding electronica (in its most minimalist form) into their own creation.



Still, it's a good, solid review.



Then again . . . while your second paragraph is filled with specifics and very neat ways of describing the feel and sound of this album, the rest sort of feels like a research paper.



I still POS though

Album Rating: 2.0

Not sure about the minimalist thing - seems pretty busy to me. And without Yorke's voice I wouldn't be able to tell who'd made this.

Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

i think of radiohead's/yorke's self-image as extremely similar to reznor's







the difference is that reznor has talent

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Well, yeah, I think that's why Yorke's one of the most important parts of the band. He inherently IS Radiohead. It's a trademark touch.



And really? Busy? Hmm...I mean I guess the drum machines SOUND busy, but it's still just that: a drum machine.

Album Rating: 4.0

they both have talent



of course, trent reznor could be classified as a god



so it's unfair to lump yorke into that classification



i mean, he may win an oscar for an album with a song called cocksucker on it



only reznor can do that

Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

one oscar = roughly 35 grammys



i believe that is the correct conversion rate

Album Rating: 4.0

i think it's fair to say that

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

I'm very sad that I won't be able to write a review for this album on sputnik (at least I think I am).

This should be the default review

Album Rating: 2.0

Well, yeah, I think that's why Yorke's one of the most important parts of the band. He inherently IS Radiohead. It's a trademark touch.



And really? Busy? Hmm...I mean I guess the drum machines SOUND busy, but it's still just that: a drum machine.

Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

This should be the default review

Album Rating: 3.0

Superb review, as expected. I would love to see you write a new positive review, though!