blink-182 Blink-182
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
innerdark
October 28th 2005


749 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

ok, when i try that it usually censors me.



:-(



innerdark
October 28th 2005


749 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

yay, censorship sucks





ocelot-05
November 20th 2005


807 Comments


I detest Blink's music, but there's one thing about the band I really love. Unlike Simple Plan and such bands, they don't have videos with poor, lost teenagers in their rooms crying about their girlfriend dumping them. They don't take themselves so serioiusly. They dress up, they mess around, and make some hilarious music videos.

Electric City
November 20th 2005


15756 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

^ True. They may sound like every other piece of shit MTV feeds us and calls it punk, but they have the good sense to know that punk is more towards just having fun.



(Dont confuse having fun with being a dumbass though *wink*)

innerdark
December 8th 2005


749 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

ok, that was random

innerdark
December 10th 2005


749 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

well, i read an interview with tom that said that the re-formation could happen as mark and tom will have to start to get along again seeing as they co-own atticus and Macbeth

Cravinov13
December 10th 2005


3854 Comments


I... can't... stand... Blink... 1... 80... 2

Electric City
December 10th 2005


15756 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

BLin k182 has gone so far down in terms of my opinion of them. They used to be number 1 for me a year ago. Now they dont even crack my top 20

Neoteric
December 10th 2005


3243 Comments


Ouch, coming from Mr. Pop-punk boy himself.

innerdark
December 11th 2005


749 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Yeah, mark and tom fell out over the whole BCR thing, he thought that tom was going to ditch the band and had done since box car



then after the recording of this it came to a hed, mark and tom fell out and took an indefinate hiatu



blink's old stuff (pre travis) is still some of my favourite music, the newer albums aren't as good IMO

masada
December 11th 2005


2733 Comments


This is their only album worth listening to.

Mainly because it isn't written by 20 year olds who want to be 10 year old (and it doesn't suck lolz).

innerdark
December 11th 2005


749 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

i downloaded the flyswatter stuff, which all ended up on their 1st 2 albums, it was all good and the demo was when they were 17 do hah

Neoteric
December 11th 2005


3243 Comments


*ahem* it's bread man

*br3ad man, don't be afraid to use the power of the L337

[quote][/quote]




Cravinov13
December 11th 2005


3854 Comments


^^ You do realise it is near impossible to tell what it is you are trying to say wth those keyboarding skills of yours.

Diabulus in musica
December 18th 2005


485 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

blink sucks as much as simple plan

labonza01
December 18th 2005


546 Comments


hey, metaldude, i agree that simple plan sucks, but blink is the best band to walk the face of the earth, also, there is no point in posting negative comments on bands that you dont like, cause none of us really care that much if u dont like the band, just post on bands you do like and give the rest of us space. as for the album, i like it, but not as much as old blink. oh, and simple plan is a band of huge posers who sold out and were never ever goodThis Message Edited On 12.17.05

DownPaymentBlues78
December 18th 2005


278 Comments


Personally, I care that he doesn't like them. He's got just as much right to say that he doesn't like them as you do to say you do like them. The claim that 'blink is the best band to walk the face of the earth' is simply laughable, as they are so very very far from even thinking about touching that claim.

labonza01
December 18th 2005


546 Comments


i was just wondering why he was reading a review for a band he doesnt like, seems like a total waste of time to me

DownPaymentBlues78
December 19th 2005


278 Comments


Well he's just saying the opposite of "blink rocks". Why isn't that being an ass? He thinks they suck.

labonza01
December 19th 2005


546 Comments


im not saying he doesnt have the right to voice his opinion, i just think it would be more constructive to do it on a band he likes instead of writing "this band sucks" on the reviews of bands he doesnt like. looking at a review for a band that you think sucks seems like a waste of time



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy