Buckcherry All Night Long
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
PoodleRapist
August 4th 2010


269 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

yeah... and that's actually one of their least obnoxious songs

Ire
August 4th 2010


41944 Comments


HEY THIS REVIEW IS PRETTY ORIGINAL

East Hastings
August 4th 2010


4418 Comments


JUST LIKE THIS ALBUM

ThePalestMexican
August 4th 2010


2816 Comments


Apparently these guys like sex

Crowe
August 4th 2010


434 Comments


Cause everything inside it never comes out right
And when I see you cry it makes me want to die


Frankenhole
August 4th 2010


57 Comments


Omigod someone call The Cure - there is some serious competition for them.

Observer
Emeritus
August 4th 2010


9408 Comments


band is legit guys

thanks for the comments btw, not sure how I was able to do it Mike, and glad me and ties can handle whatever you pass off Davey haha. Glad to help in any way i can.

Frankenhole
August 4th 2010


57 Comments


Jared, perhaps you can add this to your plethora of 1s?

Observer
Emeritus
August 4th 2010


9408 Comments


i do need more of those, and i guess more than half of my 1.5s deserve the spot, especially Brett Gleason. I'll think about it

Frankenhole
August 4th 2010


57 Comments


I should probably add to my fives - but I'm very nitpicky about what is a classic and what isn't.

Observer
Emeritus
August 4th 2010


9408 Comments


Yeah, i definitely understand that. For the longest time I had only 4 or 5 classics and no more, and then my taste changed a bit and I ran into a few albums I fell in love with

Frankenhole
August 4th 2010


57 Comments


I have to cry while listening to an album solely becuase of the music to even think about rating it a five. Like, I'm that anal retentive about it.

Willie
Moderator
August 4th 2010


20214 Comments


Some issues:

if they even bother to read negative, average and below-rating reviews.
below-average

A leisure listen through every other track on this thing and...
leisurely

full of dear-God-not-another-isms and sad-tragic-commercial-attempts-to-sell-records stories appears on my computer.
appear

Bands like Buckcherry never surprise, if only get worse as time goes on.
they

Remember 2008’s effort from the band, Black Butterfly?
delete the bold because right now it almost comes off like the band is named Black Butterfly.

“Lit Up” had some shell life
shelf-life




Frankenhole
August 4th 2010


57 Comments


Wtf is going on in your avatar?

Willie
Moderator
August 4th 2010


20214 Comments


A sexy party.

Observer
Emeritus
August 4th 2010


9408 Comments


thanks willie, i agree and will fix the last two, "shelf-life" and "from the band", but the others i disagree with you on.

"average and below-rating"


"below-average" like you say is a more common phrase to use, but it doesn't mean what im saying in the quotes, ie equivalent to or below 2.5 rating, if you get what i mean.

"A leisure listen"


I double checked and "leisure" can be used as an adjective like i did there. Making it an adverb like you said to do, "leisurely", wouldn't necessarily be correct.

"full of dear-God-not-another-isms and sad-tragic-commercial-attempts-to-sell-records stories appears on my computer."


this is a prepositional phrase describing the noun "review", which is singular. I need to keep "appears" as a verb with an "s" to be gramatically correct. I technically cant use "appear" there like you said to.

"Bands like Buckcherry never surprise, if only get worse as time goes on."


I'm confused here, as using "they" instead of "if" would change my meaning. The bands never surprise, but might do so by how they get worse over time is how that is meant to be understood. The way you had it would need a semicolon and would change my meaning.

BigHans
August 4th 2010


30959 Comments


saw them live about 3 weeks ago at an outdoor festival and they played alot of these. It pretty much blew.

Willie
Moderator
August 4th 2010


20214 Comments


"below-average" like you say is a more common phrase to use, but it doesn't mean what im saying in the quotes, ie equivalent to or below 2.5 rating, if you get what i mean.
I see what you're getting at with "below-rating" (now, I do anyway) but it still seems weird to me.

"Bands like Buckcherry never surprise, if only get worse as time goes on."
Maybe I'm confused too, but that sentence just doesn't seem to make sense to me.

As for the others, if they can be done both ways then so be it... they just sounded weird to me at 7am.

Observer
Emeritus
August 4th 2010


9408 Comments


Alright, thanks for reading it over. I re-worded the sections you thought were weird

Willie
Moderator
August 4th 2010


20214 Comments


haha, don't change shit if it's not wrong. I didn't exactly have to pass a reading comprehension test to make staff ;)



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy