it's not hardcore at all, but it's closer to hardcore than deathcore. because there are actually hardcore influences in it.

Just stop now, please. You'll only continue to embarrass yourself and retrace yours steps.


All deathcore has hardcore in it. That's why it has the word "-core" in it. I guess I just had to inform you of that.

i'm embarrassing myself? you're the one saying that this album is death metal influenced.

if there was actually a blast beat on this album (and i don't remember any) it was through one part of one song.

i guess august burns red and as i lay dying and pretty much any popular metalcore band are now deathcore because they also use "lows" and their drummers make use of the incredibly gr1m "blast beat"

"i guess august burns red and as i lay dying and pretty much any popular metalcore band are now deathcore because they also use "lows" and their drummers use the incredibly gr1m "blast beat""


Jesus christ dude, shutup!

i'm just trying to show you how incredibly stupid that argument is. and you're saying i'm embarrassing myself and that i'm dumb. okay then.

r2deepthroat

No, you're trying to justify your argument, which doesn't really make sense considering that this and the other two bands you mentioned sound very little alike. That's what you're trying to do, and you are failing miserably.


It's deathcore. I'm done.

it doesn't matter if they sound little alike. your argument is: this is deathcore because there are lows and blastbeats. that makes it death metal influenced.

by your logic that makes all those bands also deathcore bands because they also incorporate low vocals and their drummers play blastbeats occasionally. therefore making them death metal influenced.

i'm using your logic here, and you're still calling me dumb. wat

and if i'm failing, how come you aren't saying anything to refute my statments?

"says the guy who rated a dance gavin dance album the same as jane doe and we are the romans."

ah i hate when people do this. i don't agree with those ratings either but that's his ratings and his own business, don't be a douche.

as far as the genre argument goes, the only thing other than deathcore that you could call this is metalcore. calling it hardcore will get you shot. just sayin. either way it's most likely shitty.

Album Rating: 2.5 | Sound Off

Im still trying to figure out why the fuck they used 8 string guitars on this album? they hardly use all 6 strings let alone 8 strings.

Album Rating: 3.5

TACTICAL NUKE FTW

how are you supposed to write brootal beatdowns without an extra two strings

Album Rating: 2.5

the couple songs i've heard off of this sounded pretty boring. and i've heard a lot heavier and angrier stuff before

a 4?

I am appalled. Bay of Pigs is great, but everything else is just annoyingly djenty. and I love djent

and Tactical Nuke... just no. Continent > my shit > this

The lyrics do nothing for me. All the anti-Christianity is a huge turn-off. Any band that targets religion needs to do so in a way that isn't TYPICAL. I'm just bored of it all by now.

i always thought the acacia strain wrote funny lyrics that wen't really meant to be taken seriously.

"VAN FLIP TIMES A THOUSAND"

Album Rating: 4.0

lambgoat references are always funny.

Album Rating: 3.5

says the guy who rated a dance gavin dance album the same as jane doe and we are the romans.

Album Rating: 4.5

"The Beast features Vincent doing more of a rough yell, and comes closer to singing than ever before. You can find him doing this once or twice more on the album"

I hope you aren't referring to Jamey Jasta's guest vocals.

Album Rating: 3.5

loooooooooooooool