This album really does out do all other albums in minting money people.
Great review :D
|
| |
this isn�t Dragon Ball Z they�re talking about here, folks. It�s S-E-X.
|
| |
you can tell mr reviewer wasnt familiar with rule 34
|
| |
>and the beatles aren't aimed at 10 yr old kids are they
|
| |
I agree with Morrissey. It's not as terrible as some make it out to be though... That's just because of their image.
I would never ever put on a Spice Girls album, though :PThis Message Edited On 12.29.05
.....
Fair point actually, but the general music is better in the beatles as Lennon and McCartney= Genius. And while I may dislike them in their genre their admired like Abba are I suppose making it a good pop album but thats it.
Incredible
|
| |
Leaving Led Zeppelin aside because I can't honestly argue that they are marketed toward ten-year olds, but the Beatles definitely were. When the Beatles hit it big in late 63/early 64, how old to you think those kids were that were screaming up and down the streets of every city the Beatles visited? The average age couldn't have been more than 14, and you can guarantee there were a fair share of ten-year olds swooning over Paul McCartney.
|
| |
ReturnToRock
September 16th 2005
4247 Comments
Report this Post
they're telling ten year old girls to be sex-craving b*tches! that's the main problem... led zep never did that.
would you like your little sister singing this? i sure wouldn't...This Message Edited On 09.16.05
|
| |
You're quite the anthropologist aren't you?
|
| |
huh
|
| |
|
|