Born of Osiris A Higher Place
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Se2ondComing
July 7th 2009


178 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

uhm?? whats wrong with the faceless. i hear this band being referred to the faceless alot. and then some even throw in half funny insults. Faceless is one of the best modern day tech-death metal bands. and one of the few tech death metal bands that are actual enjoyable. The people who say they suck, are the ones that instantly right a band off as crap when they realize that they've achieved great success.

GBJ
July 7th 2009


512 Comments


"instantly write a band off as crap"

but I agree completely with what you said.

Album is somewhere between a 3 and a 4

poweroftheweez
July 7th 2009


1298 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Faceless is one of the best modern day tech-death metal bands. and one of the few tech death metal bands that are actual enjoyable.


sorry, wrong.

A7XEric
July 7th 2009


322 Comments


Though I don't like this album, generic it is not.

XtheComb1neX
July 7th 2009


61 Comments


when did you buy this album. it came out today. if you bought it at 10 in the morning, listened through it once, and then wrote this very biased review that doesnt count as an opinion. the new reign was a strong starter. they tried maturing their sound this time around but it kinda flopped back. it isnt something fantastic but its a solid attempt at maturing from chugging breakdowns to technicality. good band, moderate attempt.

genericnamelol
July 7th 2009


49 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Right, because albums totally don't leak prior to their release date. Nope, that certainly never happens.

cjgone
July 8th 2009


828 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

Wow...they can't even stream this album on their myspace. Definitely won't be buying it I guess.

XtheComb1neX
July 8th 2009


61 Comments


if you dislike them so much then why even listen.

Bleak
July 8th 2009


258 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Not bad. The track Now Arise is probably my favorite because it's just simply badass.

XtheComb1neX
July 8th 2009


61 Comments


"lol at the kids giving this a 5.0"

Lol at the assholes who dont respect opinions.

superjamielol
July 8th 2009


2 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

I signed up just to say this is probably the stupidest review ever.



"I don't even like this band, but here are 5 paragraphs explaining why this album sucks."



Stick to trolling Britney Spears forums, moron.

genericnamelol
July 8th 2009


49 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

This has to be one of the dumbest things I've read in my life. Yes, I explain in 5 paragraphs why this albums sucks, how can that possibly be a bad thing? Would you prefer I don't explain why I feel this a bad album? Hey maybe I should just say "This album sucks", and have that be the entire review? The Britney Spears comment doesn't even make any sense, let alone suffice as half witty insult.

CharlestheMute
July 8th 2009


73 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

this was good.. but just good

Hopig213
July 8th 2009


4 Comments


This album should certainly be thrown in the Dumpster.
Please don't call it The Faceless 2, because the Faceless don't sound anything like this. The Faceless Rip the faces of the Born Of Shits.

circa923
July 8th 2009


74 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

"Yes, I explain in 5 paragraphs why this albums sucks, how can that possibly be a bad thing?" Because viewers wanted a review

not a 5 paragraph bashing of a band you already hate. You mentioned no highlights that others might enjoy even if you didn't,

notice how most people are voting that this review was NOT written well. Stick to writing comments and shit talking on forums

leave the reviews to someone who knows a thing or two about music.

grahamg0re
July 8th 2009


155 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

i really like the album, but no way in hell is this a five-er. the people bashing the review need to stop getting all butt hurt. i don't agree with your view but it's a legit review

genericnamelol
July 8th 2009


49 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I mentioned all the highlights I felt this album had. For instance, it's better than The New Reign, that's really the only positive thing. Also, the majority of people voting this review down, coincidentally are those who rate this album a 4.5 or above. There is no way in hell this album is a 4.5 or above. I'm sorry you don't agree with my opinion, but I laid out in the review in detail why I didn't like this album.





superjamielol
July 8th 2009


2 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

No, you laid out why you don't like the BAND. Writing a review on something you already hate is pointless, it would be like me joining a hiphop site and giving all the albums 0 stars, it contributes absolutely nothing of value and just gets my personal opinion across. circa923 is right, stick to writing "lol this sux" on forums, you obviously have no idea what actual journalism is.

genericnamelol
July 8th 2009


49 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I wrote why I hate the ALBUM. It's very clear my negative comments are directed at the album (did you even read the review?). And, I didn't automatically "hate" this album. I actually went into it thinking this album was going to be decent, seeing as early ratings were in the 3-4 range. I would agree if that honestly were the case, but part of the reason I don't like the band NOW, is because of this album.

sspedding
July 8th 2009


5775 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

"Cons:

-Generic in every sense of the word."



In what sense is it generic? I don't find this to be generic at all, I think people toss this word around stupidly these days and if they don't like something it must be generic to justify not liking it.



Album is average, songwriting is not very good. Some nice melodic passages but it doesn't really do it for me.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy