Origin Antithesis
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Shredzilla
August 11th 2009


502 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Yea, anthracks is right. Everyone of those were considered Tech Death at one time. Oh yea, Decapitated was another Tech Death band that didn't succumb to tasteless wankary.

FadeToBlack
August 11th 2009


11043 Comments


Immolation aren't tech

Anthracks
August 11th 2009


8386 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

lol

FadeToBlack
August 11th 2009


11043 Comments


I only have DoP, and that's nothing but good old school DM.

Also MA says they're normal death metal

trilogique
August 11th 2009


246 Comments


Even though I do some shitty reviews for MA, they're a bit clueless at times. Why BTBAM was removed
from MA, I'll never know. Hell, WHY IS WAKING THE CADAVER STILL ON MA?

loldongsrage

TricksterGRex
August 11th 2009


2087 Comments


they have some grind bands on there

Wizard
August 12th 2009


20627 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

theyre all technical



This could go either way. Still, calling these bands tech death is really trapping them into a corner. I kind of like to generalize and call them death metal.

Anthracks
August 12th 2009


8386 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

theyre technical regardless....technical doesn't mean wank as evidenced by these bands

trilogique
August 12th 2009


246 Comments


Technical death metal is a lot different than just death metal. Sure, you could say all death metal is technical, but there's a varying degree of technicality. I suppose it's a bit ambiguous so...



Anthracks
August 12th 2009


8386 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

thank u cpt obv



immolation/gorguts/ulcerate/deeds are all much more technical than "regular death metal"

trilogique
August 12th 2009


246 Comments


Obviously what I said wasn't obvious or else you people wouldn't even be discussing this. Immolation
aren't really tech death.

Damn, that was too many obvious' in one post. FML

loledits

Anthracks
August 12th 2009


8386 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

what you mean to say is immolation arent very wanky, however they are (more especially WERE) very technical...which is the whole point of this conversation. its getting really annoying repeating the same thing over n over

Wizard
August 13th 2009


20627 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I think you live in your own world Anthracks. You're still wrong in terms of labeling them tech-death.

Anthracks
August 13th 2009


8386 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

that's the whole point of this conversation...you label things tech-death that have wankery. immolation is/was very technical without resulting to wankery. they are especially technical and they are death metal therefore they are technical death metal. good lord

Athom
Emeritus
August 13th 2009


17249 Comments


I can live with that.

DBlitz
August 13th 2009


1693 Comments


good lord!

Wizard
August 13th 2009


20627 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

you label things tech-death that have wankery. immolation is/was very technical without resulting to wankery. they are especially technical and they are death metal therefore they are technical death metal. good lord





I can live with that.



At least you can put up a good heated argument without resorting to insults irrelevant to the conversation.



InHumanForm
August 14th 2009


316 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Immolation is technical, but to be labeled "tech death" in today's scene you have to be extremely flashy. also i like this album.

FadeToBlack
August 21st 2009


11043 Comments


not to break up the vile arguement I started, but this is far better than I expected it to be. listening to a few songs at a time is definitly the way to go

TAB
October 7th 2009


467 Comments


pretty underrated album here.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy