Krallice Krallice
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
SlaveLabor
January 27th 2009


490 Comments


WINTTTTTTTTERRRRRRR

rasputin
January 28th 2009


14968 Comments


Whoever negged this is an idiot, this is an amazing review.

Zoo
January 28th 2009


3759 Comments


lol, rasputin

jingledeath
January 28th 2009


7100 Comments


devsol's Wintersun review probably pissed off some people really badly.I don't see any other reason for this being neg'd.

superae
January 28th 2009


80 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

well-written review, just couldn't be more wrong. the album "works," and then some.

rasputin
January 28th 2009


14968 Comments


Hardly, this isn't good at all.

superae
January 28th 2009


80 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

he doesn't even go into detail on any of the songs, just dismisses it all out of hand. the guy sounds like he has a personal vendetta against mick barr or something.

Hawks
Staff Reviewer
January 28th 2009


115683 Comments

Album Rating: 2.7

This guy has a personal vendetta against pretty much everything. He's a troll anyways.

rasputin
January 28th 2009


14968 Comments


I'm pretty sure he describes the music thoroughly, going into specifics would be arbitrary because all the songs use the same techniques.

How is he a troll? He wrote two well written reviews, there was no trolling whatsoever.This Message Edited On 01.27.09

charlesfishtitz
January 28th 2009


783 Comments


Hawks10Pec being gay since forever

Poet
January 28th 2009


6156 Comments


I'm also pretty sure that this review is absolutely amazing too.

bastard
January 28th 2009


3432 Comments


This guy has a personal vendetta against pretty much everything. He's a troll anyways.


yea because disliking two overrated albums = personal vendetta against everything.

superae
January 28th 2009


80 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

describes the music thoroughly? yeah, in a few sentences or so. hardly in-depth. it's not a good review.

natey
January 28th 2009


4195 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

This review could cure cancer

rasputin
January 28th 2009


14968 Comments


describes the music thoroughly? yeah, in a few sentences or so. hardly in-depth. it's not a good review.

Oh ok, and all the other sentences don't describe anything at all? I'm not going to even bother going through this review and picking out every single bit where he describes how the album sounds, because you're that much of an idiot. I think you're just a bit butthurt.

superae
January 28th 2009


80 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

lol, butthurt. the guy is joking around through the whole review, too infatuated with his own prose to actually write about the music. a few mentions of tremelo picking and what have you is not a decent description of the album.This Message Edited On 01.27.09

rasputin
January 28th 2009


14968 Comments


Just because you don't understand his writing doesn't make it poorly written.

[quote=devsol]weave of fast-paced tremolos[/quote]
[quote=devsol]failure at uniting rhythm and melody[/quote]
[quote=devsol]dissonant and somewhat disconnected piece of music[/quote]
[quote=devsol]abysmal vocal performance, coarse yells over grating musical expression[/quote]
[quote=devsol]he so called 'melody' is non-existant, every tremolo-ed riff penned by Barr disharmoniously coinciding with its fellow guitar and almost constantly failing to provide any sort of assonance that one would associate with the simple definition of music[/quote]
[quote=devsol]From the very beginning, with 'Wretched Wisdom', Krallice just doesn't work, both on the level of its guitar lines, their relationship with each other and their relationship with the completely irritating drumming[/quote]
[quote=devsol]absolutely no harmonious correlation between every separate element that comprises the album's musical nature.[/quote]
[quote=devsol]utter mess[/quote]
[quote=devsol]imply play Darkthrone's Transilvanian Hunger, Death's Human and Avenged Sevenfold's City of Evil simultaneously, all while screaming whatever bullshit that comes into your head.[/quote]

For a brief review, that's more than enough information to provide for a convincing argument not to purchase this album. He doesn't need to go into every miniscule detail about the music, because nobody wants to read that.This Message Edited On 01.27.09

superae
January 28th 2009


80 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Yeah, I don't understand his writing. You got me.



...





It's not a good review because the guy obviously set out to hate the album, and his criticisms are ridiculous and flat-out incorrect. (Stuff like saying there is no "melody" in the guitar lines). The holier-than-thou, sarcastic, arrogant tone throughout the review makes it clear that he holds Mick Barr in contempt and was guaranteed to hate the album. I mean, I hate System of a Down, so I'm not going to write a review for their albums because it would come off in a similar way.This Message Edited On 01.27.09

rasputin
January 28th 2009


14968 Comments


How the hell do you get some sort of contempt for Mick Barr in this? It's obvious that he got the album, just like I did, because he thought it was going to be good from all the hype, and then was severely disappointed, just like I was, because it was a very poorly constructed album. I doubt he even knows who Mick Barr is other than what's said about him on MA.

natey
January 28th 2009


4195 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

tremelo picking is pretty intense



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy