Album Rating: 3.5

It's not my problem that they love Blood Mountain, it really isn't. I used that to draw people into the the review. It gets their attention.

People bitching didn't read it and that's their problem. I honestly don't care if you're too stupid to see my point, because it's more often than not a product of your own ignorance.

Even a fan of BM can read this and understand where I'm coming from. It just so happens that most people finoodling over BM happen to be a little slower than most.

What's a better way to appeal to people than to touch on one of the biggest albums of last year? Yknow?

That actually makes way more sense. Its too bad reviews as controversial as this just can't be thought of in a more open sense.
Your review format for this is like Shock Rock, except don't overuse this technique or you will end up as stale as Kiss! (my attempt to lighten the mood and make a joke)