The Rolling Stones Out of Our Heads
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
hyperboleking
July 26th 2007


407 Comments


bron-- i agree there, it was a pretty bad typo, probably the worst-timed one possible when you're discussing historical facts about a band. lol.

Willie
Moderator
July 26th 2007


20672 Comments


Hey! If nothing else, all the deletions of your reviews is helping your rating go back up, since they seem to be leaving the ones that were at least ok.

hyperboleking
July 26th 2007


407 Comments


hey! thats true! sputnik can suck my balls!

Cravinov13
July 26th 2007


3854 Comments


just because you suck doesn't mean you need to get pissy.

Bfhurricane
July 27th 2007


6284 Comments


and as for the person who said the riff was a "horn,"... uh.... no.

The intro riff to Satisfaction? Im pretty sure that is a horn...

Crysis
Emeritus
July 27th 2007


17652 Comments


Awww fuck did the Tool review get deleted?

Fort23
July 27th 2007


3776 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I wasn't around for that one. How was it?

Crysis
Emeritus
July 27th 2007


17652 Comments


Thank god hes gone.

Dis_Con_Nec_Ted
July 27th 2007


5098 Comments


is he gone forever? i know what Spat said but is there absolutely no chance he might 'join' Sputnik? at least he can be the observer (may be observing now ;P).This Message Edited On 07.26.07

Crysis
Emeritus
July 27th 2007


17652 Comments


[QUOTE=Splat Out Plath]banned permanently[/QUOTE]

I'd say yes

FR33L0RD
July 27th 2007


6400 Comments


Only really bad review by hyperboleking still up is The Doors first album, the rest of his bad reviews are gone (i think)
http://www.sputnikmusic.com/album.php?reviewid=12953This Message Edited On 07.26.07

StrizzMatik
July 27th 2007


4232 Comments


Even though he's gone now, I'd like to say that Keith Richards himself stated in a Guitar World interview, "that riff in Satisfaction was a horn. Everyone gets it confused".

burton.and.gas
August 13th 2007


641 Comments


Dude, you shoudl have stayed as the gimmick, lol only kidding. I'm not huge on the stones, but thsi review was quite well written, and you still cause controversy.

theBlackWidow
October 19th 2010


467 Comments


"Okay, yes, Mick Jagger and Keith Richards are ugly. I would prefer if
we could all avoid comments about that in the comment section"



......Is the worst attention grabber I have ever heard. Nice.

mandan
February 12th 2012


13976 Comments


Too many paragraphs. I think your review needs to be a bit more straightforward.

boleyn2
February 27th 2012


85 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

quite unconvincing album; 5 truly succesful tracks (like play with fire or cry to me... and i dont mention you-know-which songs) would've given great result had it not been for so many dull fillers; still, with all these classics it'd be hard not to consider it good

xfearbefore
April 27th 2014


2057 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Play With Fire is so bloody brilliant. Every time you think you've heard every classic song the Stones have done, you hear one you never really paid attention to and it blows your mind all over again. Such a timeless band.

mandan
April 27th 2014


13976 Comments


Need to jam this band more.

SharkTooth
April 27th 2014


15014 Comments


These guys have produced some of my all-time favorite songs,
I'm honestly surprised I haven't listened to a full album from them

mandan
April 27th 2014


13976 Comments


Their late 60's-early 70's material is prob the best they've done.

However, I myself need to jam it properly, plus I haven't heard Sticky Fingers yet.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy