Album Rating: 1.5
nope
|
| |
I've always had that problem with her, bar when I was too young to care. So many of the other women I've listened to deliver their lines with a lot more force, power, and emotion than Swift. She just sounds like generic white girl #348 most of the time to me.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
She has her moments, especially live.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
correct
edit: @agent
|
| |
yeah, I actually haven't heard much past Red because I stopped caring about her.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
she has become a much more proficient vocalist over the years. as stated above, the netflix film shows how great she is live these days.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
she sucks live
*as a singer
|
| |
Honestly, my jumping-off point would've been Speak Now had I not gotten curious about Red a couple years later. She just sounded so plain on that one, even 11-year-old me at the time of release was not that happy with it outside of a few tracks like "Better than Revenge", "Dear John", and "Back to December".
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
but you're like, what, 13 now?
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
"Back to December" is good
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
her sound these days is diametrically opposed to speak now. but it's much poppier so you still probably wouldn't be into it.
|
| |
@Asdfp: Speak Now was released a few months after I turned 11. I'm 19 now. And yes, Back to December is pretty good.
@chan: Yeah, the stuff I heard from 1989 was the best I'd heard since Fearless, but the few tracks I had a glimpse of here were dreadfully plain to me.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Swift is an average/below-average singer but a superlative songwriter who knows how to add vocal flourishes to the music that accentuate the meaning in ways that technically superior vocalists often overlook. Dylan is the classic example of a technically bad vocalist that nonetheless really knew how to vocally embody the characters/situations/stories/themes he was singing about, with a very different kind of versatility that virtuosos have. Swift is not at that level, but her approach and strengths are in that same general school. I can appreciate many singers solely for their vocal prowess, but I can also appreciate relatively-poor singers when they can write great songs and sing them well in their own unique way, and IMO Swift can.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
agreed, but she's no dylan bro
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
she's no Matt Berninger
|
| |
That's a fair analysis yeah but she isn't like Dylan lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
sorry, this album is pure trash
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
"agreed, but she's no dylan bro"
Of course. I just said she's closer to that school of "limited technical ability, knows how to shade her delivery to enhance the musical drama" rather than the school of "technical virtuoso/excellence." I just said Dylan was the classic example of the former, but that Swift wasn't on that level.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
The one song I heard, 'look at what...' is pretty cool. will check the album, the artist and the genre, as I've rejected it for a long time
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
she's no Scott Stapp
|
| |
|