Kendrick Lamar good kid, m.A.A.d city
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
chambered49
December 16th 2012


1727 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

dyin o thirst uh dyin o thirst uh

greg84
Emeritus
December 16th 2012


7654 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

This is marred by some weak tracks here and there, but the highlights on this are amazing.

Pentagon
December 16th 2012


1998 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

'Real' is the only track I can think of that is mediocre, the rest are great.

Wolfhorde
December 16th 2012


15387 Comments


Yeah, this is like 3-3.5. No way AOTY material. Especially with some of those feats, while Dre is better than the chuckle-worthy performance on Em's track(s? haven't really paid attention) it still comes off like he's trying to be relevant again.

eleventhsun
December 16th 2012


1475 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

You can say fuck our opinions all you want. You're the one who 5d a mediocre record with juvenile lyrics.





Wolfhorde
December 16th 2012


15387 Comments


You're new, your opinion on legitimate AOTYs is invalid.

J0ckstrapsFTW
December 16th 2012


3797 Comments


Then ur new

Wolfhorde
December 16th 2012


15387 Comments


Anything below 2k posts = new. And this is very generous.

J0ckstrapsFTW
December 16th 2012


3797 Comments


Ur still going to be considered new. It's just the site man if u weren't new u would understand

Wolfhorde
December 16th 2012


15387 Comments


^ what he said.

Havey
December 16th 2012


12320 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Anything below 2k posts = new.


Am I not new in your eyes, Lord Wolf?

Havey
December 16th 2012


12320 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

dude you're so mystifying

Wolfhorde
December 16th 2012


15387 Comments


"Am I not new in your eyes, Lord Wolf?"
Idk, drop the title maybe then I can answer your question. This way I'm too distracted by lordly duties like cleaning my monocle and eating caviar.

also, a list feature doesn't mean shit since every list that's actually about music or something similarily creative with enough comments/buzz/whatever gets featured. You can basically just ask for it.

anarchistfish
December 16th 2012


30566 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Anything below 2k posts = new.


More like below 7k

Wolfhorde
December 16th 2012


15387 Comments


"More like below 7k"
As I said, being generious in christmas spirit and such ect. pp.

"Wolfeworde"
Is that supposed to be some witty wordplay?

Havey
December 16th 2012


12320 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

More like below 7k


so you're saying Jash, ffs etc are new users while Atari85 isn't



and Wolf(e LOL) I refuse to call you anything other than your oh so lovely and rightful title

Wolfhorde
December 16th 2012


15387 Comments


I smell sarcasm. By the way, that title would be wrong either way. I don't accept any abbrevations of the actual title.

Havey
December 16th 2012


12320 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

nah I just can't think of anyone else deserving of such a title, wehrmacht swagery is an art that you've beautifully mastered

anarchistfish
December 16th 2012


30566 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

so you're saying Jash, ffs etc are new users while Atari85 isn't


yes my spreadsheet specifically labels them veterans-in-waiting

eleventhsun
December 16th 2012


1475 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Yup.



The internet is where people can pretend they are important based on how detached they are from the real world.



Don't let it bother you. You know a good amount of the comments on the net are meaningless drivel that they type just to

get high post count right? I see it all the time. Quality over quantity for me when it comes to any form of written word...



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy