Morbid Angel Blessed Are the Sick
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
parksungjoon
August 30th 2016


47227 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

its also good for reviews of obscure shit that only has like 3 ratings here and nobody bothers to talk about them



but yea thats about it

evilford
November 2nd 2016


71523 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

haven't jammed this band forever. changing that now.

Maco097
November 2nd 2016


3386 Comments


Their forum sucks donkey balls, but it's a great library for metal bands.

Astral Abortis
November 2nd 2016


6731 Comments


Metal Archives is the ultimate metal site

Please stop

Thalassic
November 2nd 2016


5740 Comments


"Metal Archives is the ultimate metal site, people who think it sucks are usually butthurt pozers who are mad their shitty nu core band didnt pass the test of trveness."

Lol...

EvoHavok
November 2nd 2016


8096 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I like the design of that site and it has good info on bands. For reviews and discussions one should go to other sites, though.

Thalassic
November 2nd 2016


5740 Comments


^^^ design is great and the idea of having a huge online metal library is fantastic. Furthermore there are a couple of great albums that deservingly get love at Metal Archives that they don't get anywhere else (At the Gates' Red Sky or Katatonia's December Souls for instance). Definitely not all is bad. They're just extremely inconsistent in which band to include and which band not to include. I fail to see how some bands that are included pass "the test of trveness" while several others don't. Also, some of the users there are socially awkward dicks who happen to be extremely vocal over there.

Egarran
November 2nd 2016


36862 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

When I discover some obscure album, I like to go there and read reviews that cover the entire elitist spectrum.

Thalassic
November 2nd 2016


5740 Comments


^^ exactly. Definitely not a bad site and in some way I do value the opinions the MA community has on quite a few albums (especially the positive ones).

DarkSideOfLucca
November 2nd 2016


19180 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

No, metal-archives kind of fell off honestly. I used to only be on metal-archives since something like 2002ish on. Message boards here are infinitely better, and they have some strange fucking rules about who can and can't be on their website in terms of bands. Also, I've noticed a much slower income of reviews as of late. Sputnik ftw.

Astral Abortis
November 3rd 2016


6731 Comments


Legit though if you guys think Metal Archives is a breeding ground for "elitists", do NOT ever visit NWN! forums and ESPECIALLY NOT deathmetal.org


Mystletainn
November 3rd 2016


4049 Comments


metal archives has awful reviews and reading them hurts my eyes because of the shit background

Mystletainn
November 3rd 2016


4049 Comments


sloppy reviews, sloppy musicianship

i c



Egarran
November 3rd 2016


36862 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

"reading them hurts my eyes because of the shit background"

Thanks, I thought it was only me. White text on black is a horrible thing, but there secrets to circumvent the displeasure.

Astral Abortis
November 3rd 2016


6731 Comments


Just highlight the text?

evilford
November 3rd 2016


71523 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

album is so interesting

DarkSideOfLucca
November 3rd 2016


19180 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

album rules



and the color of metal-archives blows, agreed.

Egarran
November 4th 2016


36862 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

"Just highlight the text?"

Yup, it's what I do. Feels stupid.

DarkSideOfLucca
November 4th 2016


19180 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Agreed, that's way too annoying

evilford
November 5th 2016


71523 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

bmpu



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy