Album Rating: 4.0
its also good for reviews of obscure shit that only has like 3 ratings here and nobody bothers to talk about them
but yea thats about it
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
haven't jammed this band forever. changing that now.
|
| |
Their forum sucks donkey balls, but it's a great library for metal bands.
|
| |
Metal Archives is the ultimate metal site
Please stop
|
| |
"Metal Archives is the ultimate metal site, people who think it sucks are usually butthurt pozers who are mad their shitty nu core band didnt pass the test of trveness."
Lol...
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I like the design of that site and it has good info on bands. For reviews and discussions one should go to other sites, though.
|
| |
^^^ design is great and the idea of having a huge online metal library is fantastic. Furthermore there are a couple of great albums that deservingly get love at Metal Archives that they don't get anywhere else (At the Gates' Red Sky or Katatonia's December Souls for instance). Definitely not all is bad. They're just extremely inconsistent in which band to include and which band not to include. I fail to see how some bands that are included pass "the test of trveness" while several others don't. Also, some of the users there are socially awkward dicks who happen to be extremely vocal over there.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
When I discover some obscure album, I like to go there and read reviews that cover the entire elitist spectrum.
|
| |
^^ exactly. Definitely not a bad site and in some way I do value the opinions the MA community has on quite a few albums (especially the positive ones).
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
No, metal-archives kind of fell off honestly. I used to only be on metal-archives since something like 2002ish on. Message boards here are infinitely better, and they have some strange fucking rules about who can and can't be on their website in terms of bands. Also, I've noticed a much slower income of reviews as of late. Sputnik ftw.
|
| |
Legit though if you guys think Metal Archives is a breeding ground for "elitists", do NOT ever visit NWN! forums and ESPECIALLY NOT deathmetal.org
|
| |
metal archives has awful reviews and reading them hurts my eyes because of the shit background
|
| |
sloppy reviews, sloppy musicianship
i c
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
"reading them hurts my eyes because of the shit background"
Thanks, I thought it was only me. White text on black is a horrible thing, but there secrets to circumvent the displeasure.
|
| |
Just highlight the text?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
album is so interesting
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
album rules
and the color of metal-archives blows, agreed.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
"Just highlight the text?"
Yup, it's what I do. Feels stupid.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Agreed, that's way too annoying
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
bmpu
|
| |
|
|