Vektor Terminal Redux
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Drifter
August 24th 2017


21718 Comments


Oh

Yeah I agree

ZombieToyDuck
August 24th 2017


7203 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Hey, y'all can have your own opinions idrc...

Drifter
August 24th 2017


21718 Comments


You spelled y'all wrong

ZombieToyDuck
August 24th 2017


7203 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

whatevs I fixed it

Drifter
August 24th 2017


21718 Comments


Says whatevs and then fixes it :thinking_face:

ZombieToyDuck
August 24th 2017


7203 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I type quick, don't enjoy fuckin up tho

superluminals
August 24th 2017


946 Comments


This is the correct rating, too much prog wank and weak vocals

Piglet
August 24th 2017


8592 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

one man's prog wank is another man's real wank

zakalwe
August 24th 2017


42350 Comments


You're sat on the train at 0602hrs, about to start the weekly commute. A sip of tea, check the phone, just about to stick the earphones in when the bloke opposite starts talking like the singer from this shite.

Do you.
1. Do nothing.
2. Move carriage.
3. Kick his head in.


Piglet
August 24th 2017


8592 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

4. Eat his ass

zakalwe
August 24th 2017


42350 Comments


lol. Can you imagine.

superluminals
August 24th 2017


946 Comments


Eatting ass on a train?

Egarran
August 24th 2017


36935 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Noise canceling headphones my dude.

zakalwe
August 24th 2017


42350 Comments


I've had a shag on the last train home before. The woman was rough as arseholes but neither of us complained.

Drifter
August 24th 2017


21718 Comments


I actually had this at a 1.5 initially, but I lowered it

Egarran
August 24th 2017


36935 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

You need to expand your trolling. It's very one trick right now.

DePlazz
August 24th 2017


4984 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

[2]

Faenrir
August 24th 2017


1182 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

"To my ears, it's bad. Obviously its a good album to the majority of people but I don't like it so I rated it based off how I felt about the album. Why wouldn't I rate it if this is how I felt?"



Because that's not the purpose of ratings. Obviously, i could rate all rnb albums a 1 because i don't like the genre. What would it achieve ? Nothing.

Ratings are here to help people discover other bands they would enjoy, in a genre they already know or want to try and hear the best in that genre.

If you're doing it just to piss off people (because you obviously have no clue even why this would never deserve a 1), then sod off man. Go back to the tupac discussions (but i'm guessing they're kinda dead . . . ).



If you're genuinely interested, there are a lot more accessible albums you should listen to first. Stuff like early Metallica, Megadeth, Slayer, any Death album, etc. Depends what you want to try, thrash (technical speedy metal with fast tempo, crazy riffs and solos), death metal (lower tunes, double bass drums, heavy growls in vocals), speed metal, heavy metal, etc. i'm not going to describe everything, pretty sure you can find everything for that on google easily.

superluminals
August 24th 2017


946 Comments


Why are you trying to assign universal meaning to people's ratings when it's up to the individual? Who made u god?

Faenrir
August 24th 2017


1182 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Because that's their purpose. What else would they be used for ? Think about it.



Again, what would be the point if everyone that hated a genre went and rated albums in that genre ? The albums would all be rated lower and the ratings would lose their purpose.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy