Album Rating: 4.5
Yeah, All My Love and I'm Gonna Crawl are great, not quite classic songs though for me.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
All of My Love rules, but it's depressing as fuck.
About his son who died at 5 : (
|
| |
^Agreed hard
|
| |
"1973-1976 Zeppelin is my favorite Zeppelin"
That was their creative peak.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Strong album, better than the debut. Immigrant Song, Friends, Gallow's Pole and Bron-Y-Aur Stomp all rock.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Always been me fave
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
baby I beLIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVE
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
what zep created from 73 - 76 is no where close to what they created in 69 or 70 from a creative standpoint.....from any standpoint actually
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
You crazy Houses of the Holy and Physical Graffiti are solid
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Underrated as all hell and just as good as anything they've made.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
sonofsnow no one said anything about them being solid or not
|
| |
"what zep created from 73 - 76 is no where close to what they created in 69 or 70 from a creative standpoint.....from any standpoint actually"
Haha, how do you figure that?
They were pretty standard blues rock during that earlier period. Except for LZIII which incorporated very standard folk influences.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Titan you're tripping balls boo
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
yes because there were a bunch of hard rock (dare i say heavy metal) acts such as zep in 1969
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
cuz they didn't help create and innovate what would become the heavy metal genre in 1969, right?
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
you're going to try to convince me that the creativeness came later on? when their better days were already behind them? during the emergence of changing genre's in music (that being their earlier material)? later on? really?
|
| |
Influence does not equal creativity.
Musically they were more creative during the period between 1973 - 1976. This is not even open to debate.
Whether their better years were behind them is open to debate and I strongly disagree but obviously I have no problem with you thinking that.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
daring enough to combine blues and hard rock (dare i say metal, again)
c'mon dudes
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
you are right JT, it really isn't open for debate. and it's not even about influence, it's about pioneering.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
on another note, boggles my mind how so many are fixated on physical graffiti, overshadowed music with fancy packaging, stellar production, and 5 rather classic albums leading up to it - a perfect formula for success! album has about 20 minutes worth of filler on it as well. as good as some of the songs are, they're not even close to the jams on I-IV.
|
| |
|
|