Album Rating: 4.0
Rules face [2] Second best DP behind Discovery
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Ok maybe I was a little harsh, bumped this up to 3.5 how's that.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Second best DP behind Discovery [2]
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Might 5 this
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Fucking. Do it.
|
| |
didn't jam but the singles kinda blew chunks
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
By blow chunks, you mean...
Something else
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Second best DP behind Discovery [3]
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
this album is super tight but just too damn out there in places, and just too damn safe in others.
|
| |
murail >
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I sort of have a love/hate relationship with this album. Some excellent songs here and there and just some downright puke-worthy at others. Ironically I'm not addressing Get Lucky.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
I have a hate relationship with this.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Best DP
|
| |
Best DP
Second best DP behind Discovery [2]
I'm sorry, but no fucking way
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
That damn cat.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
My personal fav Daft Punk album
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Deviant why don't you have a rating
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Ok this is starting to really grow on me again and it's already done that like 5 times which I actually kind of like. Bumped my rating. My gym teacher also loves this album.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
This would honestly be perfect if they trimmed the fat off of a few songs. The single version of "Get Lucky" is a perfect
example really: shortened, but without hacking out what makes it great. "Lose Yourself to Dance" easily could be cut back by
at least two minutes, if not more. I get that the repetition is in a way a nod back to their house roots, but it's not nearly as
effective with this new style. A few other songs could bear to the same treatment, but that's really only qualm I have with the
album.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
You're getting soft, brandon ;]
|
| |
|
|