Album Rating: 4.5

I’m going to wait for the full album, but I did give in and listen to about a minute of Invisible and was blown away.

Album Rating: 4.0

it was amazing, still reeling about the energy the crowd gave



gave me an inescapable sea of bodies crowdsurfing and moshing

Album Rating: 3.0

"but it's all an act"

Oh so you and him are buddies are ya? You know what MJK's actual personality is actually like and that he's just mostly pretending to be a cunt? Lol

Album Rating: 4.0

still bitchin?

Album Rating: 5.0

always

Album Rating: 3.0

"Oh so you and him are buddies are ya? You know what MJK's actual personality is actually like and that he's just mostly pretending to be a cunt? Lol"



The same arguement can be made towards you and it would be just as valid.



Why are you contributor again?

Album Rating: 3.0

“Well they play The Pot an entire step lower, so let's not get too excited. Back in 2006 he managed to sing it pretty damn well in original key”



yeah Adam posted on IG that they’re playing the pot in Drop C

Album Rating: 4.5

The Pot is probably the best song on here.

Album Rating: 3.0

"Why are you contributor again?"

Why are you so salty? lmao

Album Rating: 3.0

That's not salt, that's a legimate question.

Album Rating: 3.0

Lol, on a scale of 1 to Triggered how badly would you react if I wrote a scathing review of something Dir En Grey or Buck-Tick related?

Album Rating: 3.0

....you're still not answering the question? ¯_(ツ)_/¯



And that will probably look worse on you than on me buddy go ahead.

Album Rating: 1.5

If I write terrible reviews where I barely talk about the music then act like a cunt towards as many users as possie then does that mean I can also get contributing too?

Album Rating: 3.0

"....you're still not answering the question? ¯_(ツ)_/¯"

Maybe cos, in the words of MJK himself, "You're squawking at the wrong tool."

Album Rating: 3.0

"he would take it about as seriously as the rest of the site took your periphery review probably"

Well of course the review for the album was just an excuse to get the thread going. There are like 5 people on this site who actually read the reviews.

Album Rating: 3.0

"There are like 5 people on this site who actually read the reviews."



Isn't that kinda devaluing the thought and craft other contributors and staff members put into their reviews? Plus devaluing the position which you applied for in the first place?

Album Rating: 3.0

owned

Album Rating: 3.0

"Isn't that kinda devaluing the thought and craft other contributors and staff members put into their reviews and discuss with eachother? Plus devaluing the position which you applied for in the first place?"

Lol, no. It's realism. Go to the front page. Click on a random review for a not-famous album. How many people have actually liked said review or commented? That should give you a fair estimate of how many users actually read reviews to discover new music. The staff and contribs of this site are doing what they do because they enjoy doing it, not because they have expectations of appreciation.

Album Rating: 3.0

I'll leave that to the thoughts of other staff and contributors, because I'm not speaking on their behalf. If you do believe that your thoughts and words contribute little then why do you bother? What is there to enjoy about writing to a endless void?

actually there are plenty of examples of featured reviews that managed to get a solid amount of people to check out a relatively obscure album (i'm specifically counting featured ones in this case since staff and contribs do get their reviews featured most of the time)

as an example i covered an album by Blessed and there are 16 ratings for it, not counting mine, i consider that a decent number for a band that hasn't gotten attention before

jack's colourblind review is an even better example, that album got a lot of traction