Album Rating: 3.0
i love your argumentative posts futures
|
| |
"ehh they just played it safe on this"
What? How? This sounds different from everything else that came before it just like all their other albums
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
idk it does sound different from their other albums. however, that doesn't mean it would be experimental at all. to me it sounds like agalloch being agalloch without anything that made their previous albums special. it's just enjoyable and that's about it
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
yea
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
shit lol butts
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
To me it just sounds extremely uninspired.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Album isn't good yea.
|
| |
I avoided this when it first came out because of the bad reviews, but I'm listening now and it ain't bad. Production and guitar tones need some work though.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.7
This drags but has plenty of cool moments, Marrow is better though and obviously their first three are in a league of their own.
|
| |
Yeah nothing so far touches the acoustic bit of Embers, but it could be worse. I just hate how every time there's a clean guitar solo the tone just sounds so dull, especially considering some of the post rock sounds they had on PF/Mantle.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Yea there's so much character and emotion to a lot of the guitar tones on PF, TM, Ashes but here, nothing.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
album rules! still, I see some jimmies have been unceremoniously rustled
|
| |
Not a five though, hmmmmm? Not interested.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Lol, don't bother man. It's pretty boring.
|
| |
this album is good. it's not really metal, but who cares.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Yeah, it's still pretty sweet. The middle of the record is top notch.
|
| |
Idk, burger socks.
|
| |
Haha. I don't know. I'm not really here to add anything consructive. Don't let me get in the way though. You guys do your thing.
|
| |
I'm not really here to add anything constructive.
get outta here
|
| |
*posts picture of someone's avi that commented itt*
|
| |
|
|