Lou Reed and Metallica Lulu
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Surtur
November 6th 2011


637 Comments


Got made to buy this after losing a bet...

scottyvee
November 6th 2011


68 Comments


i am the table!!!

ks1
November 6th 2011


55 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

@ Surtur



That's some serious russian roulette caliber gambling You're engaging in, man.

FictionalFlames
November 6th 2011


1528 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

^ that's what she said.

metallicass
November 6th 2011


28 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

well i actually like it, at least its original.

Aids
November 6th 2011


24939 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

originality alone does not make anything good



and holy mother of god, in what universe is this a 4.5? I mean, rate things how you want but jesus.

Cipieron
November 6th 2011


3508 Comments


even jesus hates this

rasputin
November 6th 2011


14968 Comments


it astounds me how much sputnik loves to jerk off over shitty albums

if you actually know it's going to be shitty, why bother wasting your time listening to it

Cipieron
November 6th 2011


3508 Comments


how can you know if something is good if you've never heard anything bad?

and if nothing else, it's always good for some lulz

Aids
November 6th 2011


24939 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

"if you actually know it's going to be shitty, why bother wasting your time listening to it"



I dunno I was bored, and was kind of hoping sputnik was being overly retarded with all the 1s. They were kind of. Terrible album but not the worst thing I've ever heard. I listened to about half of each track before I skipped to the next one.

rasputin
November 6th 2011


14968 Comments


I dunno I was bored, and was kind of hoping sputnik was being overly retarded with all the 1s. They were kind of. Terrible album but not the worst thing I've ever heard. I listened to about half of each track before I skipped to the next one.


oh yeah, I'm not picking on you specifically or anything, I was just saying. I listened to that one song that they streamed first and realised what a turd this was and thus I never bothered with the album. I guess some people just have more time on their hands than I do. I would rather listen to the 400 or so albums I've stupidly stockpiled which I'm already certain I will like :S

Tyrael
November 6th 2011


21108 Comments


@ Aids I gave this a 1, not because it's the worst thing ever, but because they had the guts to make shitty 4 minute songs and quadriple their length (or even more) for no goddamn reason (Junior Dad springs to mind)

Aids
November 6th 2011


24939 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

"I would rather listen to the 400 or so albums I've stupidly stockpiled which I'm already certain I will like :S"



yeah I know what you mean. to be honest I had been listening to some of my favourites all night and was kind of bored of listening to music (if that makes any fucking sense). so I threw this piece of shit on while I mindlessly surfed 9gag and other internet time-wasting machines. It was like 3AM and I couldn't sleep. weird way to kill time but yeah i dunno, I wanted to see if all the negative hype was warranted. It actually was fun to listen to just for how out of place Lou Reed's vocals were.

rasputin
November 6th 2011


14968 Comments


imo lou reed lost any relevance to 'good' music well over three decades ago

or at least after transformer came out (whenever that was, cbf google)

Homeslice
November 7th 2011


177 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Album title should read- "LOL"



Arguably the worst metal song I have ever heard in my life has to be "Little Dog". It encompasses so many levels of fail its mind boggling. At least St. Anger had 1 or 2 songs that you could probably play if you had nothing else to listen to, afterwards it went back to "coaster status" on your coffee table.



This album could not even reach the level of "coaster" just out of the sheer embarrassment of just owning a copy and having to explain its purchase to friends and family. At least "St Anger" has the ubiquitous reputation of being a bad purchase by millions of fans as you laugh over it with a drink. This one has no such excuse.

Scoot
November 7th 2011


24162 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

i actually reviewed this so i listened to the whole thing

YouGotLucky
November 8th 2011


971 Comments


This album is not bad.

KILL
November 8th 2011


81582 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5 | Sound Off

yes it is

AsoTamaki
November 8th 2011


2524 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

Arguably the worst metal song I have ever heard in my life has to be "Little Dog".



Lol.

Homeslice
November 8th 2011


177 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

To be fair Sputnikmusic has the album listed under "metal". Which is not even remotely close to what this abomination is.



For more Lulz:

"Lars Ulrich also noted the negative reaction to Lulu, and stated that he wasn't surprised by the criticism due in part because, "In 1984, when hard-core Metallica fans heard acoustic guitars on 'Fade to Black', there was a nuclear meltdown in the heavy-metal community," and also noted that Reed's poetry is "not for everyone."



Lars is a failure as a musician and human being. Fade to Black is one of their best songs, to compare that to this steaming pile of garbage is ridiculous.





You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy