Vildhjarta Måsstaden Under Vatten
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Get Low
November 11th 2025


15155 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Firebug was spittin'

trilo
November 11th 2025


7081 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

spittin poo and pee yeah

JayEnder
November 11th 2025


22688 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

[2]

Demon of the Fall
November 12th 2025


38990 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Firebug coming in with a well-reasoned argument and getting shot down with either childish insults / nothing of any substance is on-brand for this side of Sput. I'm proud of you all for keeping up the tradition.

trilo
November 12th 2025


7081 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

more tepid jabbing (read: shitposting) at a difference of opinion but in keeping with sput tradition you bumbling into threads and failing the vibe check is certainly on brand



the more serious answer is i only care for firebug's opinion as far as i can throw him, which is to say his opinion is completely inconsequential to my wellbeing (rather than disliking him as a user - i fw him!) so i don't feel the need to provide a substantive response for why he's wrong, but okay fine i'll oblige:



some of his critique is vapid and handwavy. what "glue and spirit" held the first album together that isn't present here? what does "doing whats right" even mean? i certainly understand music is a lot about ~feel~ and he's not writing a thesis on the album but conversely i don't know how to engage with hollow commentary either



the more substantiated points are, in my view, nonsense. musically this sounds like the decade-later evolution of a sub-sub-sub-sub-genre they created, utilizing much of the same dissonance/excessive syncopation/spooky ambient passages/pitch shifting/minor chords and yes chugs (of which there are many on the original). they took those elements and cranked them to 11. i don't know what to tell someone who can't pick up on the stylistic similarities of the two albums with their overt use of melodic/dissonant notes overlaying a syncopated chugging backdrop. the primary difference is this album feels more freeform in its songwriting yet is surprisingly more cohesive with the motifs littered throughout. i don't think this should have been a double album (and it's my primary gripe with it) but a full playthrough gives The Album Experience™ far better than the original. let's not forget the continuing lyrical narrative and thematic consistency with the original or the fact track 8 is a literal homage to it that borders on fan service. i'm not saying this shit is high art but calling it a mislabeled companion piece is dumb/stupid/silly/incorrect/wrong/invalid sorry. frankly i'd argue this is a far better sequel than most bands' attempts



re: grooves and pointless chugs i merely disagree. just off the top of my head nar de du alskar, kaos2, masstadens nationalsang, and heartsmear have lovely groove-n-riff moments but that's also as subjective as it gets so i'm not convincing anyone otherwise



does that suffice you smarmy turd?

nash1311
November 12th 2025


10542 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

#pwnd



conversely i don't know how to engage with hollow commentary either [2]



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy