Album Rating: 3.5
Oh good, if we had no room for wrong opinions I'm not sure where you'd be!
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
"I should jack off to fully appreciate this and become one with the wank"
You may only do so if you perform it in time with the music. And last the length of the album.
|
| |
please make a clean list of my wrong opinions you constantly cite without touchtyping and present it without doing a bad take i wish you luck
|
| |
Holy shit I could not get into this at all. Its almost like everything i hate about prog rolled up into one record but to each is own.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
*obligatory ratings post goes here*
|
| |
but sowings takes are dangerous
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
to whom
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
This is why Sowing is multiple people. The takes must be spread across a variety of users, all of which take up the Sowing mantle.
|
| |
dangerously cool
|
| |
this ao'b col
|
| |
while the rest of the world has laid its roots and come to fear the badness of bad takes only sowing dares to dissentÂ
"*obligatory ratings post goes here*"
sir you have a helplist pie chart if you wanna comb my ratings for albums you've listened to i suggest you boost your optimism start in the 3.5s
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
If you rated them low there IS a fair chance they're good!
|
| |
this battle is spicey
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I'm just here so i don't get fined
|
| |
mars review this i will pay you four
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Four...
Kittens?
|
| |
four ____
blank cheque up to you
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
A small loan of four billion dollars.
To be serious for a moment, there are already 2(?) positive reviews for this. If I felt I had something unique to offer than maybe, but I don't know what I could add that hasn't been contributed already.
|
| |
yes but neither of them kick off with multiple books about how many tenuously related albums this album is definitely less overrated than
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Golly sir, I don't think I can double your book lengths.
|
| |
|
|
