Album Rating: 3.5
emo revival fanatic aww
i like 90s sounding stuff but its ok if stuff isnt 90s sounding
this is growing on me tho
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Sorry Futures, but I don't remember getting a 90's vibe from this either. Maybe I need to re-listen because it's been a while. About as 90's as Gates maybe, which isn't much.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
i think that would be worthwhile tbh
|
| |
"i'd say it was unrestrained"
nah b, so many chilled out (restrained) passages on both albums, unrestrained is probably the last adjective I'd use to describe pianos
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I saw them live tonight and they were pretty great! Played the majority of this and closed with Hiding which was fine by me.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Really wish they had gone the direction of Hiding and not this
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I love that song but I like this a lot too. They played a new song too and it's pretty similar to this with a bit more groove in it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
this has some great songs but overall the album is a bit hard to get through
|
| |
How's this stack up to Lack
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
not as intense/good. a lot more subdued. still great though
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Damn I love this album. Guys, don't forget to listen to the deluxe tracks.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
"How's this stack up to Lack"
it's a total shift in direction. not even comparable
|
| |
Sounds disappointing.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
It's still good despite that though
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
Not really
|
| |
I'll listen to it eventually, quite the differences in opinions here.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
I think you should. This is a divisive album because it differs so much from Lack I guess.
|
| |
Sounds like most agree that it doesn't hit as hard which is disappointing.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
well i guess most of us can agree the vocal delivery was the main reason why tlla hit so hard and kyle stopped screaming on this so yeah go figure
|
| |
No skramz, that's lame.
|
| |
|
|
