Pink Floyd The Dark Side Of The Moon
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
CamiloG
November 20th 2015


3036 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

"I think wham did"



I'm pretty positive he wasn't.

altertide0
November 20th 2015


3026 Comments


he said

i thought you were saying that in the abbey road thread, when we were arguing about how I thought the Beatles were not very innovative at all, great band obviously but riding the coat tales

rockandmetaljunkie
Contributing Reviewer
November 20th 2015


10075 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

the beatles were basically a boy band cover band [2]

Havey
November 20th 2015


12320 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

epic

wham49
November 20th 2015


6359 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

somewhat I said that, just dont think they deserve all the credit for any musical movement from 64 on, but obviously like them. They actually stole quite a bit from other acts that came before, and because they were the Beatles people say they were the first. But they did take what they took from others and made it mainstream

ArsMoriendi
November 20th 2015


42434 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I'm not gonna lie... I'd take Revolver and Magical Mystery Tour over all Floyd albums anyday..

evilford
November 20th 2015


72166 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

there are at least 4 floyd albums I'd take over any beatles

wham49
November 20th 2015


6359 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I probably would too, Revolver, Rubber, and White anyway, dont get everybody fascination with MMT, good album not their best though

CamiloG
November 20th 2015


3036 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

In my case it depends of my mood.

evilford
November 20th 2015


72166 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

well yeah it's obviously a matter of taste

CamiloG
November 20th 2015


3036 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

Yeah, stupid comment now that I think of it, lol.

evilford
November 20th 2015


72166 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

¯_(ツ)_/¯

zakalwe
November 20th 2015


42221 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

4 Floyd over any Beatles. No way dude!

evilford
November 20th 2015


72166 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

yeah. but see there are these things called opinions.........

Mongi123
November 20th 2015


22699 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I'd take any of Floyd's classics over The Beatles stuff any day honestly. With the exception of The Wall.

zakalwe
November 20th 2015


42221 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I'm going to go:

Darkside

White

Abbey

Animals

Revolver

Wall.



altertide0
November 20th 2015


3026 Comments


Piper
Saucerful
...
WYWH
Abbey
Revolver
Animals
Meddle
Ummagumma
...

evilford
November 20th 2015


72166 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

ummagumma lol

wham49
November 21st 2015


6359 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

completely different bands, hard to compare, depends on what I am looking for that day whether it is Beatles or Floyd

Pch101
November 22nd 2015


115 Comments


"what is this album's contribution to music? Because it didn't invent a new genre, it didn't invent new playing techniques, it didn't invent concept album... it didn't invent anything."

Because every note and every space between the notes is exactly where it should be, and nothing is included that should have been omitted.

Dark Side of the Moon is about as well-crafted as it gets. It's a complete, coherent package from beginning to end -- not because it is a concept album, but because it flows. It is not just a collection of songs that happen to be good; the sum is greater than the parts.






You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy