Album Rating: 5.0
I'm glad that the prompt is so ridiculous and not applicable to real life in any way. I guess it'd be Paracletus if I just HAD to pick one, but I'm lowkey triggered at even the notion of picking some of my favorite metal after 2000 over other favorites. Does Jane Doe count?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.7
Jane Doe is part of the core loophole, so you'd be able to listen to it in addition to Paracletus, which is an ace choice.
|
| |
Oh I thought you would only be able to listen to the one metal album, but you can listen to any number of non-metal albums for the rest of your life? Wouldn't want to though hehe.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.7
"E: To clarify, it wouldn't be the only metal album you could listen to, just the only one released between 2000 and now."
And yeah, you'd still be able to listen to Janet Jackson and Pet Shop Boys all day.
|
| |
I'll keep that in mind if I ever wanted to have blood running down from my ears
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Metal keeps me sane
Nice picks everyone
And yes, nex is a very heady fellow. He likes to explore topics thoroughly, and that's a nice™️ quality
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I'm listening to Janet Jackson rn, kinda rules... weird coincidence seeing that there, lol (albeit 5 days late)
and yeah I don't even consider Jane Doe 'metal' (which is maybe odd), I just assumed Nex's core loophole was a given
if I was being very cheeky and this restriction had any baring on anything actually real, I'd be petitioning to include post-metal under the same core-origins caveat (and would undoubtedly get knocked back for being daft!)
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.7
Janet Jackson rocks. m/
No additional loopholes, sorry.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
finally bumped to a 5
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Still thinking this is too derivative from their influences. It's not bad by any means but... :S
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Uhhhhhhh
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
"Derivative" is not on my bingo card for this album
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.7
Yeah.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
"Derivative" is not on my bingo card for this album [2]
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
yeah, I don’t get that at all (3). I feel like a decent portion of DM gets credited with a ‘classical influence’ with very little tangible link beyond non-pop structures, but these guys actually can claim that imo. The production, their use of ambience through drastic dynamic shifts and the avant-grade tendencies leaves a lot of their contemporaries behind. Some of it is familiar of course, but the overall formula is unique
These guys know texture and timbre. They emphasise that in far more forthright or convincing way than the vast majority of their contemporaries
|
| |
hell yes calmBROse
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Band
Absolutely
Slays
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.7
Yeeeeeeeeeeee.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Hawks why do I have so many dm 5s lmao
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.7
Why not is the real question???
|
| |
|
|
