Album Rating: 5.0
This grew so much leleel
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
grew off me tbh
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
took me so long to get into this
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
worth it though.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
better than la
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
um, let's not go overboard
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Better than You're Dead.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Agreed, but by just a bit.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Yeah I still really like it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I like YD! a little more
|
| |
UtQC>Cosmo>>>>YD!
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I prefer Cosmo and LA, but this is fantastic too.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
this is a little like in a silent way to yd!'s bitches brew
|
| |
LA is a different conversation entirely
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
'Cause it's amazing? Yeah agreed.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
It is a very different style though. I just can't talk about flylo rankings without bringing it up.
|
| |
"'Cause it's amazing? Yeah agreed. "
well yes its amazing but mostly because LA is like the quintessential 'glitch hop' kind of album. he basically put everyone else in the scene to shame and solidified himself as the grandmaster with that album. there are many like it, but none that can touch its shine.
where these are entirely his own creative aspirations. after he mastered the scene with LA he basically just took off into alien la-la land. LA is the best of its kind whereas these are the ONLY ones of their kind. so yeah. i dont really even see them on the same playing field. different, equally respectable playing fields.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Yeah it was groundbreaking instrumental hip hop. He had a very distinctive way of crafting beats.
|
| |
i dunno more what i was getting at is that this trilogy is more groundbreaking, LA wasnt really that groundbreaking, it was just completely definitive
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I think what came after was more unique yeah, but LA gave new light to the genre even if it was quickly abandoned afterward.
|
| |
|
|