Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

One must be pretty deaf to actually consider giving this the lowest possible rating. Just for its contribution to music in general this deserves to be respected and honored with more than a 1.0 rating.

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

The guitar solos in time and money alone, are just a reason for giving this album more than 1.0

what contribution?

Album Rating: 5.0

?

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

"what contribution?"



One of the silliest questions ever asked.

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

agreed

Album Rating: 5.0

But obviously sarcastic. Jesus you fuckers have a lot to learn.

Album Rating: 5.0

for real though id love to see a review or at least a short explanation / defense of giving this a 1.0

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

You can never call something "obvious" in here... Nothing is obvious until it is proven the other way.

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

sarcastic or not it's silly agreed

Album Rating: 5.0

yeah no offense but the only thing silly is when people assume you can read sarcasm on an internet forum

Album Rating: 5.0

Chuck if it helps when I was around 13 I heard this for the first time and for me back then it was a borderline 1 for the following reasons.

It sounded incredibly dated like someone going through the archives and picking out some relic that was revered but whose magic had long since past its sell by date.

There was no excitement, it was just noodling from dinosaurs who didn't have a clue.

It didn't soar or reach any crescendo or 'speak' to me.

Album Rating: 5.0

I think one of the funniest things on sput is the attempt to troll-proof the sacred cows.



Freedom of speech: yes.

Freedom to rate an established classic 1/5: no

Album Rating: 5.0

Doof dude this place is fascist as fuck.

Album Rating: 5.0

"or 'speak' to me."



ironic, innit?



yeah fair enough. truthfully when i first heard this around the same age, i cant remember what my first impressions were. but i know soon thereafter floyd became my favorite band and gilmour completely changed how i felt and played the guitar.



i'm open to all opinions and i sort of find the fact it's against the rules to rate any album whatever you want kind of lame, but i think that rule was probably put in place because of troll accounts. but at the same time i think when one's opinion is so clearly different than the majority it's worth sharing your reasoning.

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

"But at the same time i think when one's opinion is so clearly different than the majority it's worth sharing your reasoning. "



This!

Album Rating: 5.0

Part of me is amused at the idea that without safeguards the highest pink Floyd rating on the site would go down to a 3.7 thanks to organised troll campaigns...but then I do understand the logic.



You want that top 200 albums staying pretty settled rather than the new Grimes gatecrashing the All Time Top 10 with 100 votes or whatever

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

"i'm open to all opinions and i sort of find the fact it's against the rules to rate any album whatever you want kind of lame, but i think that rule was probably put in place because of troll accounts. but at the same time i think when one's opinion is so clearly different than the majority it's worth sharing your reasoning. "



this is completely reasonable. idk who we're talking about but I think people should be free to rate something whatever they feel is right but at the same time, this is a forum where music is discussed so yeah, agreed with the above

Album Rating: 5.0

if trolls ran the site the site would implode and lose meaning, not amusing in the slightest to me

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

"Part of me is amused at the idea that without safeguards the highest pink Floyd rating on the site would go down to a 3.7 thanks to organised troll campaigns...but then I do understand the logic. "



understand the logic of the trolls?