Album Rating: 2.0
I am, I just want more people engaged by my writing prior to. I need to make my name bigger around here first.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
You'll be pretty well known if you post that review, believe me.
|
| |
that won't change a thing because everyone is either retarded and will get mad no matter what or won't care at all especially once they look at your awful ratings
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
"I am, I just want more people engaged by my writing prior to. I need to make my name bigger around here first."
How are we going to get engaged to your writing if you don't post reviews? Do you just want us to pos your In Flames review a bunch of times?
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
As per the usual, the writing will be great. Whether or not you can handle contrasting opinions is another issue though
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
What the hell is a pos? are you people saying it like "piece of shit"?
|
| |
positive, as in give the review a thumps up or an endorsement or whatever
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
:I
|
| |
lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
So by your logic, Enter the Wu-Tang, In the Court of the Crimson King, Rust in Peace, Close to the Edge, Abbey Road, Liquid Swords, Ok Computer, Symbolic, Led Zeppelin IV, Master of Reality, and Ride the Lightning all suck because they are loved by the majority of music culture and this site?
|
| |
yes
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
Post ur review we're ready dammit
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
No evilford, you can't comprehend his intense superb writing skills!
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
Stop putting words in my mouth.
|
| |
when did he say you said that
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
this is a good album
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
It's done
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Awesome album
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off
pretty much an objective fact
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
an objective classic
thats not easy
|
| |
|
|