James Blake The Colour in Anything
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Lord(e)Po)))ts
May 14th 2016


70256 Comments


its funny how people on this site get all fuckin uppity-anne about anything that even slightly exceeds like an hour and 3 minutes and yet they 5 every new kendrick lamar and swans album



Tyler.
May 14th 2016


19035 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Yeah length is suddenly a thing with this for some reason

climactic
May 14th 2016


22926 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

so tru potato

wwf
May 14th 2016


7198 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

tbf really long albums are easier to achieve when the point of the music is to create suspense like it is for Swans.

Lord(e)Po)))ts
May 14th 2016


70256 Comments


"tbf really long albums are easier to achieve when the point of the music is to create suspense like it is for Swans."

that doesnt explain tpab which has absolutely no reason to be as long as it is other than that hip hop is often over-indulgent in that aspect. like considering there are like 5 songs that range between shit-average as fuck on that album it has way less business being that long than this album does when the only two songs i could do without are the two short piano ballady tracks.

also 'creating suspense' doesnt always work for swans either (*ehem the seer)

but yeah, basically this album isnt that long yall are just weak as fuck

DoofusWainwright
May 14th 2016


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

My rating is admitting there is a 4/5 among this material and ignoring the length issue, I'll probably edit it down when I burn a physical copy of this



A few tunes drag

Lord(e)Po)))ts
May 14th 2016


70256 Comments


"My rating is admitting there is a 4/5 among this material and ignoring the length issue, I'll probably edit it down when I burn a physical copy of this"

holy fuck every fucking thing you say man

every fucking thing you say

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/fd/79/e1/fd79e14bfdd0a5172eb0a305311c0c9e.jpg

DoofusWainwright
May 14th 2016


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

You said the exact same thing - the 'man and his piano' songs are dull



I was saying I'd edit the album down not my rating

Lord(e)Po)))ts
May 14th 2016


70256 Comments


"You said the exact same thing - the 'man and his piano' songs are dull"

doofus logic:

the piano ballads are my least favourite = i am editing out some of the songs on this album when i burn myself a physical copy



theBoneyKing
May 14th 2016


24890 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Idk I feel the standard 35-50 minute runtime is the ideal album length, an hour is fine but after that I need there to be some reason to justify the length, either being intended as a double album or being extremely consistent. This is definitely quite consistent but it feels like he could have edited it down to an hour or so for an even more consistent listen without losing anything important.

Lord(e)Po)))ts
May 14th 2016


70256 Comments


oh wait i see it now they are the exact same thing wow how did i miss that before haha brb gonna go chop this up and burn myself a physical copy

Lord(e)Po)))ts
May 14th 2016


70256 Comments


"Idk I feel the standard 35-50 minute runtime is the ideal album length, an hour is fine but after that I need there to be some reason to justify the length, either being intended as a double album or being extremely consistent. This is definitely quite consistent but it feels like he could have edited it down to an hour or so for an even more consistent listen without losing anything important. "

lmao. yeah an hour and sixteen minute double album. no.

im sure you'll survive those extra 16 whole minutes outside of your comfort zone tbh

anarchistfish
May 14th 2016


30566 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

10 track albums around 45-50 mins long tend to be my ideal



this seems a bit bloated at first but I think you're meant to have to delve a bit deeper into it

Lord(e)Po)))ts
May 14th 2016


70256 Comments


btw doofus i just want to stress that like 75% of everything wrong with your comment is the blaspheme of burning full albums to CD let alone fucking editing them down before doing it. as a musician i would like to shit on your face personally.

anarchistfish
May 14th 2016


30566 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

youre like those people that don't like when people put pepper on food they cooked



it's gonna get peppered man. probably some grated cheese too

Lord(e)Po)))ts
May 14th 2016


70256 Comments


"10 track albums around 45-50 mins long tend to be my ideal"

why would how many tracks there are correlate to ideal album runtime in any significant way

Keyblade
May 14th 2016


30810 Comments


damn ppl still burn cd's like it's 2002

anarchistfish
May 14th 2016


30566 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

i dig listening to tracks individually more than albums as a whole (this album is sort of an exception)



would you like me to offer my dick up for castration?

Lord(e)Po)))ts
May 14th 2016


70256 Comments


"youre like those people that don't like when people put pepper on food they cooked



it's gonna get peppered man. probably some grated cheese too"

thats retarded. everything needs fresh cracked pepper and grated cheese. burning edited copies of full albums is like getting a nice dinner and when the waiter offers you fresh cheese and pepper you take them and smash them on the floor then spoon up a quarter of your dish fling it at the wall, smash the rest of the food into your dumbass face and then run out without paying.

Lord(e)Po)))ts
May 14th 2016


70256 Comments


"i dig listening to tracks individually more than albums as a whole (this album is sort of an exception)



would you like me to offer my dick for castration?"

and burning mixed cds is perfectly fine so no you can keep your tiny little useless dick for now



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy