Job For A Cowboy Genesis
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
LifeInABox
August 1st 2007


3709 Comments


Oh, shush Crav.

Cravinov13
August 1st 2007


3854 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

:p

Shadows
Moderator
August 1st 2007


2530 Comments


Haha, do one for Onset Of Putreficaton. Or, just do one for Epitaph and let me do my planned OoP review, and we can post them on the same day ! :lol:

Sounds good, I was planning on doing Epitaph. When is your Onset review coming?

Man, last time I posted here I was insanely drunk. :lol:

ToWhatEnd
August 1st 2007


3173 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

:chug: good stuff there. So the whole name debate, Job For A Cowboy, isn't a cowboy considered a job? I still like the name nevertheless but someone pointed out that a cowboy is considered a job in some parts and I thought it was an interesting thought.

SylentEcho
August 1st 2007


1606 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

each individual song is nice....but all put together in one album makes it really boring. Boring album...unlike Doom.

snerefedsav
August 1st 2007


968 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

they were ok when they were "deathcore" (even though it was bland), but this album is really bland. sounds like a bad cannibal corpse immitation.

SylentEcho
August 1st 2007


1606 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

No it sounds exactly like Deicide except less brutal and a bit more hxc. :P

Cravinov13
August 1st 2007


3854 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

No, it sounds like suck.

OhMyGandhi
August 1st 2007


101 Comments


its all arguements to...

LifeInABox
August 1st 2007


3709 Comments


Sounds good, I was planning on doing Epitaph. When is your Onset review coming?
Hopefully quite soon. It is very hard to write a quality review for Necrophagist :pThis Message Edited On 08.01.07

Tyler
Emeritus
August 1st 2007


7927 Comments


You like Necrophagist but what you still is said 100% accurate.

LifeInABox
August 1st 2007


3709 Comments


Double post! That video is awesome.

Wizard
August 2nd 2007


20630 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Great review, but this band is the definition of generic deathcore or whatever the genre is called that Metalblade Records has been abusing lately with its roster.

LifeInABox
August 2nd 2007


3709 Comments


Wrong. There is no such thing as "Deathcore", and if there was, this album definalty wouldn't be considered it.

masscows
August 2nd 2007


2230 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

you know all those bands you keep calling death metal/metalcore? TTEOTD? ASP? Think death metal/metalcore in a contraction.



If that's not too hard...

ToWhatEnd
August 2nd 2007


3173 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

He knows what people think deathcore is but it's just a dumb nazi genre label. And don't start about this now cause there are already 10 pages with ranting going nowhere about this 'deathcore' label in this thread. We need a change of pace...hey shads what all did you drink the other night?

Cravinov13
August 2nd 2007


3854 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Wrong. There is no such thing as "Deathcore", and if there was, this album

definalty wouldn't be considered it.




In the eye of the beholder Hbp. In the eye of the beholder.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deathcore ----- the eyes of many beholders.



This shit is shit.This Message Edited On 08.01.07

2muchket!
August 4th 2007


906 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Good album. It's all death metal rather than doom ep which was a mix between death metal and metalcore

Cravinov13
August 4th 2007


3854 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

it's all crap metal

Wizard
August 4th 2007


20630 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Hbp,

Who gives a rats ass if its deathcore or whatever (that wasnt the point). But I will say this, they do fit under the genre of generic, bland metal.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy