Alice in Chains Dirt
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
xfearbefore
August 20th 2020


2057 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Songs like Milk It and Radio Friendly Unit Shifter, Negative Creep, those are some seriously heavy fuckin' riffs man, Nirvana were certainly far more interested in melodic, more pop oriented metal/punk songwriting but to say they weren't as "heavy" as AIC or Soundgarden is wrong IMO, AIC and Soundgarden were definitely more "metal" than Nirvana but Nirvana were heavy as fuck as well and like I said in response to the comment that said they weren't known for being "heavy", that's all everyone said about In Utero. A lot of the more pop-minded casual fans were turned off by how abrasive and noisy and angry that record was. So they were definitely known for their heavy sound at that time. And Bleach is much the same way. I wouldn't argue AIC and Soundgarden were more metal. I guess it just depends on what your interpretation of being a "heavy" band means. Cause like I said some of those riffs on In Utero and Bleach are heavy as all fuck.

Allergist
August 20th 2020


1081 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Sure some of their songs are heavy, but Nirvana’s heaviest was another walk in the park for Soundgarden. Even then, Nirvana only had a handful of songs like that, whereas Alice In Chains and especially Soundgarden made careers out of it. It’s like saying Creed is heavier than deathcore because two or three Creed songs have breakdowns.

unclereich
August 20th 2020


14006 Comments


a rare fearbefore sighting

Egarran
August 20th 2020


36862 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

And damn do people want to debate him.

Well, we will surely all be smarter about what heaviness really means.

claygurnz
August 20th 2020


7793 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Soundgarden never made songs as unhinged as some of the ones on In Utero that were mentioned above. Nirvana are definitely a heavy band compared to most radio rock

Sure, it's not exactly metalcore, deathcore, sputcore, trumpcore, obamacare, yomamacore or any of the other cores that this website is obsessed with, but it's pretty heavy stuff.



Egarran
August 20th 2020


36862 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Alright I think that settles it, people!

Allergist
August 22nd 2020


1081 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

It’s not about us being elitists. I moderately like and certainly respect Nirvana’s work. But they aren’t metal.

Larkinhill
August 22nd 2020


8315 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Yeah. They just aren’t! But they’re heavy in a different way, especially on In Utero. But it’s more heavy ass punk than metal. AiC and, to a slightly lesser extent, Soundgarden are the two “metal grunge” bands. Pearl Jam is classic rock grunge. Pumpkins and STP are more alt metal grunge.



Fuck am I talking about, STP and Pumpkins aren’t grunge.

Larkinhill
August 22nd 2020


8315 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Genre labels are stupid. Gruuuunge haha. All those bands sound pretty different. They’re all rock/hard rock though!

ArsMoriendi
August 22nd 2020


42337 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

"STP and Pumpkins aren’t grunge."



I'd say STP is totally grunge unless you restrict grunge only to the Seattle area, which I wouldn't

Emim
August 22nd 2020


38525 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Yeah STP is grunge through and through

Allergist
August 22nd 2020


1081 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Even STP is heavier than Nirvana. Core has some good metal influence in there.

Kompys2000
August 22nd 2020


9483 Comments


I though the reason people disliked STP was that they supposedly ripped off other grunge bands

Emim
August 22nd 2020


38525 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Isn't Scott Weiland kind of a tool too?

ArsMoriendi
August 22nd 2020


42337 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Maybe, who knows?

SitarHero
August 22nd 2020


14826 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Is grunge a genre? The eternal debate continues.

Emim
August 22nd 2020


38525 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Does rocks float on lava?

bloc
August 22nd 2020


70880 Comments


According to Dante's Peak, yes they do

xfearbefore
August 23rd 2020


2057 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I think Larkinhill and claygurnz get the gist of what I'm trying to say. I definitely was not trying to argue that Nirvana were in any way more "metal" than Soundgarden or AIC, just that their sound, specifically in the In Utero era, was very abrasive and noisy and very much HEAVY for rock music at that time and even what people expected from Nirvana who were already considered a more "heavy" band than certainly almost every other popular rock band before them of that era, which were mostly shit hair metal bands like Winger. I'm not saying Nirvana were heavier than "Jesus Christ Pose" or something, I'm just saying they were definitely considered HEAVY for that time and frankly a lot of their work still is heavy for that time or any. I don't see any kind of pop commercial appeal to a song like Negative Creep. That's just angry guitars and screaming and noise. And it's beautiful.



Hard disagree with Allergist saying STP were heavier than Nirvana. Not even close. And I love STP. They never produced anything remotely as dissonant and angry as the shit on Bleach and In Utero.

Emim
August 23rd 2020


38525 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

"According to Dante's Peak, yes they do"



God, that scene with the grandma pushing the boat out into the water while getting boiled alive scarred me as a child.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy