that's ~transgressive~ and ~subversive~ af kudos to them
|
| |
What are it’s main flaws though besides subjective things like ‘snobbishness’ it’s supposed ‘soullessness’? I mean it’s not really about community in the sense that Sput is so criticising it for that is like criticising Sput for its database which we all know is terrible.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
Do we all know, oh wise one?
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
I think perhaps only you know, and we are all damned to wander these wastelands.
|
| |
lol I mean we all know it’s terrible in comparison to RYM’s, I mean a lot of it is updated using RYM’s info.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
As a site, RYM destroys Sputnik in every possible way. As a community, it's more like the other way around.
|
| |
Exactly.
|
| |
Both have the same percentage of autistic users. The difference is the users who are autistic at RYM were autistic in the 1970s.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Fucking lol
|
| |
RYM for ratings, Sputnik for community
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
I like how RYM's users are like
"omg this is the best album I've heard. It rules so hard!!!: 3/5"
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Never understood that level of stinge, if I'm willing to listen to an album more than once it's probably getting at least a 4.
|
| |
Having a lower positive rating gives you more room for variance to rate stuff you like. And seeing as I only really rate stuff I like or listen to multiple times, that makes sense to me. Like why only use 3 different ratings to distinguish different levels of appreciation for stuff you like when you can use 5 or 6?
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
I guess I just prefer to have more levels for stuff I dislike lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
hey swipenet, nice dig m/
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Thanks man m/
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
They're p great
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
their entire discography jams m/
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.9
Pale Folklore is best yeah.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Ashes > but all 3 are classic so w/e
|
| |
|
|
