Album Rating: 5.0
My clear AOTY
|
| |
same but ive listened to next to nothing from this past year
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
This is not even the best album for shoegaze release this year.
|
| |
doubtful
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
the first three songs are top-notch, sugar for the pill has great songwriting but an okay instrumental. everyone knows is by far their worst song in their discography. it really takes a downfall from that song, but luckily we got falling ashes as a pretty decent closer.
also, i don't see the hype for go get it. can someone explain?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
^ What a total penis
|
| |
A-A-R-D-V-A-R-K
A-A-R-D-V-A-R-K
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
This is probably aoty
|
| |
Everyone Knows is one of my favorites here, actually.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
^ What a total penis
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
THIS USER HAS BEEN BANNED FOR BEING A TOTAL PENIS
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I've only heard it once but the new Airiel album is just as good as this if not better, maybe the best shoegaze of the year, check it out people
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Airiel's vocal in the 'battle of sealand' disgusted me. Is it still worth checking?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Haven't heard that album so I can't say, tbh though (like this album) it's on the very dreamy end of the shoegaze spectrum so idk if you'd dig it much
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Basically, the vocal melody in 'Battle of Sealand' is so basic. I feel bad since the instrumental is actually good. It really hurts my experience.
I'd check their newest tho.
|
| |
airiels vocals are like the best part of the band, especially that album...da hell
literally the only reason i listen to them is for their vocal melodies
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
i will say it again: airiel winks & kisses eps are classic shoegaze, they deserve way more recognition
|
| |
ive only heard "in your room" by them and it was a 5 star shoegaze song, ive kept my eye on the release date for their newest so im def checking that out
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
"airiel winks & kisses eps are classic shoegaze, they deserve way more recognition"
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
| |
It's more aesthetically pleasing seeing them go the entire length of the quoted sentence
|
| |
|
|
