In Flames Battles
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Nazzadan
February 25th 2018


2433 Comments


I squash the beef

EphemeralEternity
February 25th 2018


4937 Comments


jfc aiwaz go get a routine colonoscopy or play bingo or watch daytime television or watch your kids playing in their front yard through a pair of binoculars or join AA or something pls

heck
February 25th 2018


7715 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

do you think about her when you touch yourself

heck
February 25th 2018


7715 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

they're close but october rust got that atmosphere dude

InFlamesWeThrash666
February 25th 2018


10631 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

Sweet thread

RippingCorpse1986
February 25th 2018


3229 Comments


Now the thread smells like month-old jizz stains. Not as much as the Science Fiction one, but still.

alamo
July 27th 2018


5973 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

finally got the courage to listen to this....... lets see

alamo
July 27th 2018


5973 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

i didnt mind the first 3 tracks but it gets really bad after that......... ive always liked anders vocals but they just sound vERY bad here and the more bmth-esque it gets the worse it is.... im now listening to wallflower and this 2 min underwhelming intro that gets nowhere is hilariously bad loll

Casavir
July 27th 2018


5676 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

I like how it took people this long to realize how bad this band is considering that much of the material prior to this was pretty much the writing on the wall for these last two albums.

Hawks
Staff Reviewer
July 27th 2018


120533 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Here we go lol.

Observer
Emeritus
July 27th 2018


9483 Comments


Pretty mind boggling.

Can you imagine being in the band and listening to this and then listening to something you made well over a decade and a half ago, and still think this is worth putting out there for sell?

Hawks
Staff Reviewer
July 27th 2018


120533 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Nah they all suck Casavir knows best.l we all have to listen to him.

Casavir
July 27th 2018


5676 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Much of their '90s material is overrated (I'm willing to admit that I'm a bit of a hardass as far as this time is concerned) and everything from 2000 onward is either boring or terrible, Clayman included.

Hawks
Staff Reviewer
July 27th 2018


120533 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Yeah no.

Observer
Emeritus
July 27th 2018


9483 Comments


I agree on the 90s, the only album i like is Colony, and the rest is wish wash yeah. But I mean still that music that far back then was better than this by exponential amounts. I just dont see how the band thought this was any good.

Casavir
July 27th 2018


5676 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

It's because In Flames has basically been Anders Friden's ongoing midlife crisis since Reroute to Remain.

alamo
July 27th 2018


5973 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

post-2000 in flames overrated? lollllllllllllll

Kusangii
July 27th 2018


8729 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0 | Sound Off

"It's because In Flames has basically been Anders Friden's ongoing midlife crisis since Reroute to Remain."



Couldn't have said it any better than that. And I used to love RTR-Come Clarity.

frozencarl
July 27th 2018


2054 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

"It's because In Flames has basically been Anders Friden's ongoing midlife crisis since Reroute to Remain."





holy shit lmao

TheTripP
July 27th 2018


4949 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

yall just don't understand music evolution... this is top not- I can't i'm sorry ima go puke now



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy