Bring Me The Horizon Sempiternal
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
TheNexus100
March 11th 2013


2696 Comments


this or the previous one would be tied for their best. dont know why i bother listening every time this band releases something, their literally one of the most consistently terrible bands on the planet, but I like being able to say "yeah i heard it"

necroscope86
March 11th 2013


213 Comments


Two tracks through so far and it sounds alright.

jmnewcomer18
March 11th 2013


3815 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

I honestly dont see how someone could give this a 2 or lower, especially with great songs like Snakes and Hospital for Souls, which are two of the best tracks ive heard in Very long time. I respect any opinion but when someone rates an album like this a 2 or a 1.5 it kind of surprises me to say the least.

jmnewcomer18
March 11th 2013


3815 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

tracks 3,7,8, and 11 are easily the best.

TheNexus100
March 11th 2013


2696 Comments


if this band made two of the best tracks youve heard in a long time, then they are most likely the only band youve listened too for a long time

jmnewcomer18
March 11th 2013


3815 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

no i just started listening to them last year, and i think that almost everything before this was shit. They matured alot, with the exeption of lyrics.

TheNexus100
March 11th 2013


2696 Comments


yeah they matured from 1/5 quality music to 2/5 quality music, at their absolute best

jmnewcomer18
March 11th 2013


3815 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Fair enough.

Azn.
March 11th 2013


5632 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

in the big scheme of things, this still kinda sucks

jmnewcomer18
March 11th 2013


3815 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Or maybe its just a grower and in a month or so you might give it a 3 or 3.5. Who knows

anarchistfish
March 11th 2013


30539 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

This isn't a grower. Strongly hook based music is rarely grower music

ILJ
March 11th 2013


6942 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

Anarchist's right, it's a snoozer

jmnewcomer18
March 11th 2013


3815 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

He didnt say it was a snoozer, he said it was strongly hook based, and gave it a 4.5. meaning he didnt have to grow to like it

ILJ
March 11th 2013


6942 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

I don't think you understood my comment but okay. I wasn't really implying he actually said it was a snoozer.

jmnewcomer18
March 11th 2013


3815 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

ahhhh my mistake man. sorry i misunderstood the situation lol. Neck

ILJ
March 11th 2013


6942 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

Yeah really I was just putting words into his mouth. heh.

BigPleb
March 11th 2013


65808 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

Like I said before, replay value is low

anarchistfish
March 11th 2013


30539 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

it is a bit, might bump down at some point

Azn.
March 11th 2013


5632 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Initially it didn't really capture my attention; nothing new or interesting to me.

ILJ
March 11th 2013


6942 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

it's right between a 2 and 4



also opinions, is the answer to your question.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy